Inferential methods for comparing two single cases

J. R. Crawford, P. H. Garthwaite, L. T. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In neuropsychological single-case studies, it is not uncommon for researchers to compare the scores of two single cases. Classical (and Bayesian) statistical methods are developed for such problems, which, unlike existing methods, refer the scores of the two single cases to a control sample. These methods allow researchers to compare two cases' scores, with or without allowing for the effects of covariates. The methods provide a hypothesis test (one- or two-tailed), point and interval estimates of the effect size of the difference, and point and interval estimates of the percentage of pairs of controls that will exhibit larger differences than the cases. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the statistical theory underlying the methods is sound and that the methods are robust in the face of departures from normality. The methods have been implemented in computer programs, and these are described and made available (to download, go to http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~psy086/dept/Compare_Two_Cases.htm).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-400
Number of pages24
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Bayes Theorem
Software
Hypothesis Test
Statistical Methods
Effect Size
Departure
Monte Carlo Simulation
Sound
Normality

Keywords

  • single-case methods
  • Bayesian statistics
  • dissociations
  • neuropsychological methods
  • credible limits
  • multiple indicators

Cite this

Inferential methods for comparing two single cases. / Crawford, J. R.; Garthwaite, P. H.; Wood, L. T.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2010, p. 377-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crawford, J. R. ; Garthwaite, P. H. ; Wood, L. T. / Inferential methods for comparing two single cases. In: Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2010 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 377-400.
@article{81f602d4b7244bb8b71cd0b939b7c99a,
title = "Inferential methods for comparing two single cases",
abstract = "In neuropsychological single-case studies, it is not uncommon for researchers to compare the scores of two single cases. Classical (and Bayesian) statistical methods are developed for such problems, which, unlike existing methods, refer the scores of the two single cases to a control sample. These methods allow researchers to compare two cases' scores, with or without allowing for the effects of covariates. The methods provide a hypothesis test (one- or two-tailed), point and interval estimates of the effect size of the difference, and point and interval estimates of the percentage of pairs of controls that will exhibit larger differences than the cases. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the statistical theory underlying the methods is sound and that the methods are robust in the face of departures from normality. The methods have been implemented in computer programs, and these are described and made available (to download, go to http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~psy086/dept/Compare_Two_Cases.htm).",
keywords = "single-case methods, Bayesian statistics, dissociations, neuropsychological methods, credible limits, multiple indicators",
author = "Crawford, {J. R.} and Garthwaite, {P. H.} and Wood, {L. T.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/02643294.2011.559158",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "377--400",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inferential methods for comparing two single cases

AU - Crawford, J. R.

AU - Garthwaite, P. H.

AU - Wood, L. T.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In neuropsychological single-case studies, it is not uncommon for researchers to compare the scores of two single cases. Classical (and Bayesian) statistical methods are developed for such problems, which, unlike existing methods, refer the scores of the two single cases to a control sample. These methods allow researchers to compare two cases' scores, with or without allowing for the effects of covariates. The methods provide a hypothesis test (one- or two-tailed), point and interval estimates of the effect size of the difference, and point and interval estimates of the percentage of pairs of controls that will exhibit larger differences than the cases. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the statistical theory underlying the methods is sound and that the methods are robust in the face of departures from normality. The methods have been implemented in computer programs, and these are described and made available (to download, go to http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~psy086/dept/Compare_Two_Cases.htm).

AB - In neuropsychological single-case studies, it is not uncommon for researchers to compare the scores of two single cases. Classical (and Bayesian) statistical methods are developed for such problems, which, unlike existing methods, refer the scores of the two single cases to a control sample. These methods allow researchers to compare two cases' scores, with or without allowing for the effects of covariates. The methods provide a hypothesis test (one- or two-tailed), point and interval estimates of the effect size of the difference, and point and interval estimates of the percentage of pairs of controls that will exhibit larger differences than the cases. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the statistical theory underlying the methods is sound and that the methods are robust in the face of departures from normality. The methods have been implemented in computer programs, and these are described and made available (to download, go to http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~psy086/dept/Compare_Two_Cases.htm).

KW - single-case methods

KW - Bayesian statistics

KW - dissociations

KW - neuropsychological methods

KW - credible limits

KW - multiple indicators

U2 - 10.1080/02643294.2011.559158

DO - 10.1080/02643294.2011.559158

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 377

EP - 400

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

IS - 5

ER -