Insolvency Set-Off, Discharged Debts and Protected Trust Deeds: Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Donnelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For the second time in recent years, a significant case on payment protection insurance (“PPI”) and protected trust deeds has come before the courts.1 In Dooneen Ltd v Mond (“Dooneen”),2 the UK Supreme Court held that a discharged debtor, rather than the trustee, was entitled to receive PPI compensation that was due to the debtor but unknown to the trustee when a “final distribution” of the estate was made.3 Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Donnelly (“Donnelly”)4 involves similar facts, but focuses on the different question of whether insolvency set-off5 can be utilised by a bank to resist or limit a PPI claim by a discharged debtor. The Inner House's refusal to allow insolvency set-off may be correct, but there are scenarios not too far removed from that in Donnelly in which the result could be different, and it might be asked whether, like the outcome in Dooneen itself, the outcome is “scarcely…satisfactory”.6 In addition, related litigation involving the potential reduction of the debtor's discharge raises further issues of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-268
Number of pages7
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date30 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Apr 2020

    Fingerprint

Cite this