Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM

Chris Beaverstocka , Tom Richardson, Alireza Maheri, Askin Isikveren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Flight control system design typically involves hardware and software development, requiring the definition of both continuous and discrete design parameters. The control surface topology is an example of a discrete optimization problem, whereas the tuning of control system gains is an example of a continuous one. Contemporary design practice classically involves decoupling these two problems, however, they are intrinsically linked; for example, the maximum performance attainable by the control system software is determined by the control system topology employed. The cascaded effect is that no definitive sequential roadmap of development can be established, resulting in the requirement for an iterative framework using dynamic programming or optimization methods. This paper presents a framework for aircraft design together with the Flight Control System Designer Toolkit, and the Computerised Environment for Aircraft Synthesis and Integrated Optimisation Methods. The software platform was developed for the European Framework 6 Program Simulating Stability and Control and integrates both the reliability-driven hardware analysis and the performance-driven software design. A case study is presented, based on the NASA Boeing 747–100 model, in order to demonstrate the potential impact of introducing control design early into the design process and to show the intrinsic nature of the hardware–software FCS problem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-46
Number of pages27
JournalCanadian Aeronautics and Space Journal
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Flight control systems
Control systems
Aircraft
Topology
Control surfaces
Software design
Dynamic programming
Computer hardware
NASA
Software engineering
Tuning
Systems analysis
Hardware

Cite this

Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM. / Beaverstocka , Chris; Richardson, Tom; Maheri, Alireza; Isikveren, Askin.

In: Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2012, p. 29-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beaverstocka , Chris ; Richardson, Tom ; Maheri, Alireza ; Isikveren, Askin. / Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM. In: Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 29-46.
@article{ca9ff4c65ed747faadf6c9c02982d126,
title = "Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM",
abstract = "Flight control system design typically involves hardware and software development, requiring the definition of both continuous and discrete design parameters. The control surface topology is an example of a discrete optimization problem, whereas the tuning of control system gains is an example of a continuous one. Contemporary design practice classically involves decoupling these two problems, however, they are intrinsically linked; for example, the maximum performance attainable by the control system software is determined by the control system topology employed. The cascaded effect is that no definitive sequential roadmap of development can be established, resulting in the requirement for an iterative framework using dynamic programming or optimization methods. This paper presents a framework for aircraft design together with the Flight Control System Designer Toolkit, and the Computerised Environment for Aircraft Synthesis and Integrated Optimisation Methods. The software platform was developed for the European Framework 6 Program Simulating Stability and Control and integrates both the reliability-driven hardware analysis and the performance-driven software design. A case study is presented, based on the NASA Boeing 747–100 model, in order to demonstrate the potential impact of introducing control design early into the design process and to show the intrinsic nature of the hardware–software FCS problem.",
author = "Chris Beaverstocka and Tom Richardson and Alireza Maheri and Askin Isikveren",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.5589/q12-003",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "29--46",
journal = "Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM

AU - Beaverstocka , Chris

AU - Richardson, Tom

AU - Maheri, Alireza

AU - Isikveren, Askin

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Flight control system design typically involves hardware and software development, requiring the definition of both continuous and discrete design parameters. The control surface topology is an example of a discrete optimization problem, whereas the tuning of control system gains is an example of a continuous one. Contemporary design practice classically involves decoupling these two problems, however, they are intrinsically linked; for example, the maximum performance attainable by the control system software is determined by the control system topology employed. The cascaded effect is that no definitive sequential roadmap of development can be established, resulting in the requirement for an iterative framework using dynamic programming or optimization methods. This paper presents a framework for aircraft design together with the Flight Control System Designer Toolkit, and the Computerised Environment for Aircraft Synthesis and Integrated Optimisation Methods. The software platform was developed for the European Framework 6 Program Simulating Stability and Control and integrates both the reliability-driven hardware analysis and the performance-driven software design. A case study is presented, based on the NASA Boeing 747–100 model, in order to demonstrate the potential impact of introducing control design early into the design process and to show the intrinsic nature of the hardware–software FCS problem.

AB - Flight control system design typically involves hardware and software development, requiring the definition of both continuous and discrete design parameters. The control surface topology is an example of a discrete optimization problem, whereas the tuning of control system gains is an example of a continuous one. Contemporary design practice classically involves decoupling these two problems, however, they are intrinsically linked; for example, the maximum performance attainable by the control system software is determined by the control system topology employed. The cascaded effect is that no definitive sequential roadmap of development can be established, resulting in the requirement for an iterative framework using dynamic programming or optimization methods. This paper presents a framework for aircraft design together with the Flight Control System Designer Toolkit, and the Computerised Environment for Aircraft Synthesis and Integrated Optimisation Methods. The software platform was developed for the European Framework 6 Program Simulating Stability and Control and integrates both the reliability-driven hardware analysis and the performance-driven software design. A case study is presented, based on the NASA Boeing 747–100 model, in order to demonstrate the potential impact of introducing control design early into the design process and to show the intrinsic nature of the hardware–software FCS problem.

U2 - 10.5589/q12-003

DO - 10.5589/q12-003

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 29

EP - 46

JO - Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal

JF - Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal

IS - 1

ER -