IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference?

Abbe Brown, Charlotte Waelde

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntellectual Property and General Legal Principles
Subtitle of host publicationIs IP a Lex Specialis?
EditorsGraeme Dinwoodie
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages215-245
Number of pages31
ISBN (Electronic)978 1 78471495 6
ISBN (Print)978 1 78471494 9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Publication series

NameATRIP Intellectual Property Series
PublisherEdward Elgar

Fingerprint

human rights
disability
Law
dance
visual impairment
treaty
obligation
leader
human being

Cite this

Brown, A., & Waelde, C. (2015). IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? In G. Dinwoodie (Ed.), Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis? (pp. 215-245). (ATRIP Intellectual Property Series). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956

IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism : Does copyright law deal with difference? / Brown, Abbe; Waelde, Charlotte.

Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis?. ed. / Graeme Dinwoodie. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. p. 215-245 (ATRIP Intellectual Property Series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Brown, A & Waelde, C 2015, IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? in G Dinwoodie (ed.), Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis?. ATRIP Intellectual Property Series, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 215-245. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956
Brown A, Waelde C. IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference? In Dinwoodie G, editor, Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis?. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2015. p. 215-245. (ATRIP Intellectual Property Series). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956
Brown, Abbe ; Waelde, Charlotte. / IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism : Does copyright law deal with difference?. Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis?. editor / Graeme Dinwoodie. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. pp. 215-245 (ATRIP Intellectual Property Series).
@inbook{18ff1eaebc8445cca0fad744052a3308,
title = "IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism: Does copyright law deal with difference?",
abstract = "This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.",
author = "Abbe Brown and Charlotte Waelde",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4337/9781784714956",
language = "English",
isbn = "978 1 78471494 9",
series = "ATRIP Intellectual Property Series",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
pages = "215--245",
editor = "Graeme Dinwoodie",
booktitle = "Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - IP, disability, culture and exceptionalism

T2 - Does copyright law deal with difference?

AU - Brown, Abbe

AU - Waelde, Charlotte

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.

AB - This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.

U2 - 10.4337/9781784714956

DO - 10.4337/9781784714956

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978 1 78471494 9

T3 - ATRIP Intellectual Property Series

SP - 215

EP - 245

BT - Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles

A2 - Dinwoodie, Graeme

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -