Is resistant soil organic matter more sensitive to temperature than labile organic matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent paper by Knorr et al. (2005a) suggested that the decomposition of resistant soil organic matter is more temperature sensitive than labile organic matter. In Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model, the reference decay rate was presumed to be same for all pools of soil carbon. We refit Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model but allow both the activation energy and the reference decay rate to vary among soil C pools. Under these conditions, a similar fit to measured data can be obtained without invoking the assumption that the resistant C pool is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool. Other published evidence does not unequivocally support Knorr et al.'s (2005a) hypothesis of increased temperature sensitivity of resistant pools of soil carbon. Because of the lack of experimental data, Knorr et al.'s (2005a) conclusion that the decomposition of the resistant SOM is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool is premature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-68
Number of pages4
JournalBiogeosciences Discussions
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • decomposition
  • carbon
  • respiration
  • CO2
  • dependence
  • quality
  • fluxes
  • models

Cite this

Is resistant soil organic matter more sensitive to temperature than labile organic matter? / Fang, Changming; Smith, Pete; Smith, Joanne Ursula.

In: Biogeosciences Discussions, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2006, p. 65-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3206209ba5584b6e9932a9c3043861e0,
title = "Is resistant soil organic matter more sensitive to temperature than labile organic matter?",
abstract = "A recent paper by Knorr et al. (2005a) suggested that the decomposition of resistant soil organic matter is more temperature sensitive than labile organic matter. In Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model, the reference decay rate was presumed to be same for all pools of soil carbon. We refit Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model but allow both the activation energy and the reference decay rate to vary among soil C pools. Under these conditions, a similar fit to measured data can be obtained without invoking the assumption that the resistant C pool is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool. Other published evidence does not unequivocally support Knorr et al.'s (2005a) hypothesis of increased temperature sensitivity of resistant pools of soil carbon. Because of the lack of experimental data, Knorr et al.'s (2005a) conclusion that the decomposition of the resistant SOM is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool is premature.",
keywords = "decomposition, carbon, respiration, CO2, dependence, quality, fluxes, models",
author = "Changming Fang and Pete Smith and Smith, {Joanne Ursula}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.5194/bg-3-65-2006",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "65--68",
journal = "Biogeosciences Discussions",
issn = "1810-6277",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is resistant soil organic matter more sensitive to temperature than labile organic matter?

AU - Fang, Changming

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Smith, Joanne Ursula

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A recent paper by Knorr et al. (2005a) suggested that the decomposition of resistant soil organic matter is more temperature sensitive than labile organic matter. In Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model, the reference decay rate was presumed to be same for all pools of soil carbon. We refit Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model but allow both the activation energy and the reference decay rate to vary among soil C pools. Under these conditions, a similar fit to measured data can be obtained without invoking the assumption that the resistant C pool is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool. Other published evidence does not unequivocally support Knorr et al.'s (2005a) hypothesis of increased temperature sensitivity of resistant pools of soil carbon. Because of the lack of experimental data, Knorr et al.'s (2005a) conclusion that the decomposition of the resistant SOM is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool is premature.

AB - A recent paper by Knorr et al. (2005a) suggested that the decomposition of resistant soil organic matter is more temperature sensitive than labile organic matter. In Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model, the reference decay rate was presumed to be same for all pools of soil carbon. We refit Knorr et al.'s (2005a) model but allow both the activation energy and the reference decay rate to vary among soil C pools. Under these conditions, a similar fit to measured data can be obtained without invoking the assumption that the resistant C pool is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool. Other published evidence does not unequivocally support Knorr et al.'s (2005a) hypothesis of increased temperature sensitivity of resistant pools of soil carbon. Because of the lack of experimental data, Knorr et al.'s (2005a) conclusion that the decomposition of the resistant SOM is more temperature sensitive than the labile pool is premature.

KW - decomposition

KW - carbon

KW - respiration

KW - CO2

KW - dependence

KW - quality

KW - fluxes

KW - models

U2 - 10.5194/bg-3-65-2006

DO - 10.5194/bg-3-65-2006

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 65

EP - 68

JO - Biogeosciences Discussions

JF - Biogeosciences Discussions

SN - 1810-6277

IS - 1

ER -