Leverage and performance: do size and crisis matter?

Albert Danso*, Theophilus A. Lartey, Daniel Gyimah, Emmanuel Adu-Ameyaw

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper contributes to the capital structure literature by examining the impact of financial leverage on firm performance and also the extent to which firm size and crisis matter in the leverage -performance relationship. Design/methodology/approach: Using data from 2403 Indian firms during the period 1995–2014, generating a total of 19,544 firm-year observations, panel econometric methods are employed to test the leverage-performance relationship. Findings: Drawing insights from agency theory and using Tobin's Q (TQ) as our main measure of performance, the authors uncover that financial leverage is negatively and significantly related to firm performance. The authors also observe that the impact of financial leverage on firm performance is lower for smaller firms than larger ones. Finally, the authors show that the 2007/08 financial crisis had no significant impact on the relationship between financial leverage and firm performance. Originality/value: The paper provides fresh evidence on the impact of leverage on performance, particularly from the Indian context. This study is also among the first studies to examine the role of firm size and financial crisis in the leverage-performance relationship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-655
Number of pages21
JournalManagerial Finance
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date11 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Financial crisis
  • Firm performance
  • India
  • Leverage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leverage and performance: do size and crisis matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this