Local experiences of liberal peace

marketization and emergent conflict dynamics in Sierra Leone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over the past 20 years scholars have repeatedly highlighted the complex relationship between conflict, peace, and economics. It is today accepted that economic factors at the global, regional, national, and local levels can promote conflict in various ways and that economic factors are therefore central in establishing a sustainable post-conflict peace. However, while the scholarly literature includes much nuance regarding the precise nature of these complex relationships, practices of peacebuilding are often far less nuanced. Instead there is a tendency to pin the hopes of fragile post-conflict states on establishing a liberalized and supposedly peace promoting economy and a worrying absence of grounded assessments of the impacts of such policies. This paper argues that the resulting lack of clarity regarding the local impacts of such peacebuilding mechanisms contributes to continued unwarranted enthusiasm for marketization among policy makers and practitioners.
This issue is addressed directly by exploring the destabilizing and potentially conflict inducing impacts of one Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) project in rural Sierra Leone. The dominance of liberal approaches to economic policy within peacebuilding has recently combined with a surge in large-scale FDI projects often labeled as “land-grabs” which can be interpreted as a direct embodiment of the liberal peace paradigm. While the liberal peace assumes that such projects will help by paying taxes, rebuilding state capacity, and employing idle young males, the paper illustrates that among local populations such projects can be experienced as deeply disruptive and potentially conflict promoting. It therefore describes four specific mechanisms by which the project in this setting endangers Sierra Leone’s still precarious transition to peace. The paper concludes with recommendations for peacebuilding theorists, policy advocates, and practitioners trying to navigate the difficult waters of post-conflict peacebuilding by way of large-scale FDI and marketization in general.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-581
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume53
Issue number4
Early online date11 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Sierra Leone
peace
Economics
direct investment
foreign investment
experience
economic factors
Taxation
local population
Economic Policy
taxes
Water
paradigm
water
economy
lack
economics

Keywords

  • peacebuilding
  • marketization
  • liberal peace
  • foreign direct investment
  • land-grab
  • Sierra Leone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Local experiences of liberal peace : marketization and emergent conflict dynamics in Sierra Leone. / Millar, Gearoid.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 53, No. 4, 07.2016, p. 569-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c79b9d1aaf14e4983e661c2d6c5a20f,
title = "Local experiences of liberal peace: marketization and emergent conflict dynamics in Sierra Leone",
abstract = "Over the past 20 years scholars have repeatedly highlighted the complex relationship between conflict, peace, and economics. It is today accepted that economic factors at the global, regional, national, and local levels can promote conflict in various ways and that economic factors are therefore central in establishing a sustainable post-conflict peace. However, while the scholarly literature includes much nuance regarding the precise nature of these complex relationships, practices of peacebuilding are often far less nuanced. Instead there is a tendency to pin the hopes of fragile post-conflict states on establishing a liberalized and supposedly peace promoting economy and a worrying absence of grounded assessments of the impacts of such policies. This paper argues that the resulting lack of clarity regarding the local impacts of such peacebuilding mechanisms contributes to continued unwarranted enthusiasm for marketization among policy makers and practitioners. This issue is addressed directly by exploring the destabilizing and potentially conflict inducing impacts of one Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) project in rural Sierra Leone. The dominance of liberal approaches to economic policy within peacebuilding has recently combined with a surge in large-scale FDI projects often labeled as “land-grabs” which can be interpreted as a direct embodiment of the liberal peace paradigm. While the liberal peace assumes that such projects will help by paying taxes, rebuilding state capacity, and employing idle young males, the paper illustrates that among local populations such projects can be experienced as deeply disruptive and potentially conflict promoting. It therefore describes four specific mechanisms by which the project in this setting endangers Sierra Leone’s still precarious transition to peace. The paper concludes with recommendations for peacebuilding theorists, policy advocates, and practitioners trying to navigate the difficult waters of post-conflict peacebuilding by way of large-scale FDI and marketization in general.",
keywords = "peacebuilding, marketization , liberal peace, foreign direct investment, land-grab, Sierra Leone",
author = "Gearoid Millar",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0022343316632580",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "569--581",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local experiences of liberal peace

T2 - marketization and emergent conflict dynamics in Sierra Leone

AU - Millar, Gearoid

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Over the past 20 years scholars have repeatedly highlighted the complex relationship between conflict, peace, and economics. It is today accepted that economic factors at the global, regional, national, and local levels can promote conflict in various ways and that economic factors are therefore central in establishing a sustainable post-conflict peace. However, while the scholarly literature includes much nuance regarding the precise nature of these complex relationships, practices of peacebuilding are often far less nuanced. Instead there is a tendency to pin the hopes of fragile post-conflict states on establishing a liberalized and supposedly peace promoting economy and a worrying absence of grounded assessments of the impacts of such policies. This paper argues that the resulting lack of clarity regarding the local impacts of such peacebuilding mechanisms contributes to continued unwarranted enthusiasm for marketization among policy makers and practitioners. This issue is addressed directly by exploring the destabilizing and potentially conflict inducing impacts of one Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) project in rural Sierra Leone. The dominance of liberal approaches to economic policy within peacebuilding has recently combined with a surge in large-scale FDI projects often labeled as “land-grabs” which can be interpreted as a direct embodiment of the liberal peace paradigm. While the liberal peace assumes that such projects will help by paying taxes, rebuilding state capacity, and employing idle young males, the paper illustrates that among local populations such projects can be experienced as deeply disruptive and potentially conflict promoting. It therefore describes four specific mechanisms by which the project in this setting endangers Sierra Leone’s still precarious transition to peace. The paper concludes with recommendations for peacebuilding theorists, policy advocates, and practitioners trying to navigate the difficult waters of post-conflict peacebuilding by way of large-scale FDI and marketization in general.

AB - Over the past 20 years scholars have repeatedly highlighted the complex relationship between conflict, peace, and economics. It is today accepted that economic factors at the global, regional, national, and local levels can promote conflict in various ways and that economic factors are therefore central in establishing a sustainable post-conflict peace. However, while the scholarly literature includes much nuance regarding the precise nature of these complex relationships, practices of peacebuilding are often far less nuanced. Instead there is a tendency to pin the hopes of fragile post-conflict states on establishing a liberalized and supposedly peace promoting economy and a worrying absence of grounded assessments of the impacts of such policies. This paper argues that the resulting lack of clarity regarding the local impacts of such peacebuilding mechanisms contributes to continued unwarranted enthusiasm for marketization among policy makers and practitioners. This issue is addressed directly by exploring the destabilizing and potentially conflict inducing impacts of one Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) project in rural Sierra Leone. The dominance of liberal approaches to economic policy within peacebuilding has recently combined with a surge in large-scale FDI projects often labeled as “land-grabs” which can be interpreted as a direct embodiment of the liberal peace paradigm. While the liberal peace assumes that such projects will help by paying taxes, rebuilding state capacity, and employing idle young males, the paper illustrates that among local populations such projects can be experienced as deeply disruptive and potentially conflict promoting. It therefore describes four specific mechanisms by which the project in this setting endangers Sierra Leone’s still precarious transition to peace. The paper concludes with recommendations for peacebuilding theorists, policy advocates, and practitioners trying to navigate the difficult waters of post-conflict peacebuilding by way of large-scale FDI and marketization in general.

KW - peacebuilding

KW - marketization

KW - liberal peace

KW - foreign direct investment

KW - land-grab

KW - Sierra Leone

U2 - 10.1177/0022343316632580

DO - 10.1177/0022343316632580

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 569

EP - 581

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 4

ER -