Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice

a consensus approach

S. Michie, Marie Johnston, C. Abraham, R. Lawton, D. M. Parker, Anne Elizabeth Walker, Psychological Theory Grp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1033 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in ( 1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and ( 2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience.

Methods: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: ( 1) identifying theoretical constructs; ( 2) simplifying into construct domains; ( 3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; ( 4) interdisciplinary evaluation; ( 5) validating the domain list; and ( 6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory'' group ( n = 18), a "health services research'' group ( n = 13), and a "health psychology'' group ( n = 30).

Results: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: ( 1) knowledge, ( 2) skills, ( 3) social/ professional role and identity, ( 4) beliefs about capabilities, ( 5) beliefs about consequences, ( 6) motivation and goals, ( 7) memory, attention and decision processes, ( 8) environmental context and resources, ( 9) social influences, ( 10) emotion regulation, ( 11) behavioural regulation, and ( 12) nature of the behaviour.

Conclusions: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-33
Number of pages7
JournalQuality & safety in health care
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • clinical behavior
  • interventions
  • guidelines

Cite this

Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice : a consensus approach. / Michie, S.; Johnston, Marie; Abraham, C.; Lawton, R.; Parker, D. M.; Walker, Anne Elizabeth; Psychological Theory Grp.

In: Quality & safety in health care, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2005, p. 26-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Michie, S, Johnston, M, Abraham, C, Lawton, R, Parker, DM, Walker, AE & Psychological Theory Grp 2005, 'Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach', Quality & safety in health care, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
Michie, S. ; Johnston, Marie ; Abraham, C. ; Lawton, R. ; Parker, D. M. ; Walker, Anne Elizabeth ; Psychological Theory Grp. / Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice : a consensus approach. In: Quality & safety in health care. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 26-33.
@article{9e1e9ad7f0054258b2f6e927d6d0c899,
title = "Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach",
abstract = "Background: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in ( 1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and ( 2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience.Methods: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: ( 1) identifying theoretical constructs; ( 2) simplifying into construct domains; ( 3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; ( 4) interdisciplinary evaluation; ( 5) validating the domain list; and ( 6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a {"}psychological theory'' group ( n = 18), a {"}health services research'' group ( n = 13), and a {"}health psychology'' group ( n = 30).Results: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: ( 1) knowledge, ( 2) skills, ( 3) social/ professional role and identity, ( 4) beliefs about capabilities, ( 5) beliefs about consequences, ( 6) motivation and goals, ( 7) memory, attention and decision processes, ( 8) environmental context and resources, ( 9) social influences, ( 10) emotion regulation, ( 11) behavioural regulation, and ( 12) nature of the behaviour.Conclusions: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.",
keywords = "clinical behavior, interventions, guidelines",
author = "S. Michie and Marie Johnston and C. Abraham and R. Lawton and Parker, {D. M.} and Walker, {Anne Elizabeth} and {Psychological Theory Grp}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2004.011155",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "26--33",
journal = "Quality & safety in health care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice

T2 - a consensus approach

AU - Michie, S.

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Abraham, C.

AU - Lawton, R.

AU - Parker, D. M.

AU - Walker, Anne Elizabeth

AU - Psychological Theory Grp

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Background: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in ( 1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and ( 2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience.Methods: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: ( 1) identifying theoretical constructs; ( 2) simplifying into construct domains; ( 3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; ( 4) interdisciplinary evaluation; ( 5) validating the domain list; and ( 6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory'' group ( n = 18), a "health services research'' group ( n = 13), and a "health psychology'' group ( n = 30).Results: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: ( 1) knowledge, ( 2) skills, ( 3) social/ professional role and identity, ( 4) beliefs about capabilities, ( 5) beliefs about consequences, ( 6) motivation and goals, ( 7) memory, attention and decision processes, ( 8) environmental context and resources, ( 9) social influences, ( 10) emotion regulation, ( 11) behavioural regulation, and ( 12) nature of the behaviour.Conclusions: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.

AB - Background: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in ( 1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and ( 2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience.Methods: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: ( 1) identifying theoretical constructs; ( 2) simplifying into construct domains; ( 3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; ( 4) interdisciplinary evaluation; ( 5) validating the domain list; and ( 6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory'' group ( n = 18), a "health services research'' group ( n = 13), and a "health psychology'' group ( n = 30).Results: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: ( 1) knowledge, ( 2) skills, ( 3) social/ professional role and identity, ( 4) beliefs about capabilities, ( 5) beliefs about consequences, ( 6) motivation and goals, ( 7) memory, attention and decision processes, ( 8) environmental context and resources, ( 9) social influences, ( 10) emotion regulation, ( 11) behavioural regulation, and ( 12) nature of the behaviour.Conclusions: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.

KW - clinical behavior

KW - interventions

KW - guidelines

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 26

EP - 33

JO - Quality & safety in health care

JF - Quality & safety in health care

SN - 1475-3898

IS - 1

ER -