Measuring knowledge exchange

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

In this paper, the reasons for studying knowledge exchange in the context of design are discussed, including the benefits of knowledge exchange and the contributions that design can bring in improving its implementation. The paper explores why there appears to be a lack of rigorous comparative methods. If such methods were to exist, they would allow for examination of whether certain strategies for improving knowledge exchange processes are more effective than others. A potential solution to this is proposed in the form of knowledge exchange proxies which can be developed to give an objective measurement of successful knowledge exchange, without requiring extensive longitudinal studies which might otherwise be necessary. It is speculated that measures relating to use of language and shared mental models might function as these proxies, but it is also noted that significant further work in this area is required, and more effective proxies may emerge from this.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-4
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013
EventThe Knowledge Exchange: An Interactive Conference - University of Lancaster, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Duration: 25 Sep 201327 Sep 2013
http://thecreativeexchange.org/tkex

Conference

ConferenceThe Knowledge Exchange
Abbreviated titleThe KE conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLancaster
Period25/09/1327/09/13
Internet address

Fingerprint

Knowledge exchange
Language
Longitudinal study
Shared mental model
Comparative method

Keywords

  • knowledge exchange
  • comparative measures
  • evaluation

Cite this

Jacobs, N. (2013). Measuring knowledge exchange. 1-4. Paper presented at The Knowledge Exchange, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Measuring knowledge exchange. / Jacobs, Naomi.

2013. 1-4 Paper presented at The Knowledge Exchange, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Jacobs, N 2013, 'Measuring knowledge exchange' Paper presented at The Knowledge Exchange, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 25/09/13 - 27/09/13, pp. 1-4.
Jacobs N. Measuring knowledge exchange. 2013. Paper presented at The Knowledge Exchange, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Jacobs, Naomi. / Measuring knowledge exchange. Paper presented at The Knowledge Exchange, Lancaster, United Kingdom.4 p.
@conference{fd184fc490d44160b0985f5d558423c1,
title = "Measuring knowledge exchange",
abstract = "In this paper, the reasons for studying knowledge exchange in the context of design are discussed, including the benefits of knowledge exchange and the contributions that design can bring in improving its implementation. The paper explores why there appears to be a lack of rigorous comparative methods. If such methods were to exist, they would allow for examination of whether certain strategies for improving knowledge exchange processes are more effective than others. A potential solution to this is proposed in the form of knowledge exchange proxies which can be developed to give an objective measurement of successful knowledge exchange, without requiring extensive longitudinal studies which might otherwise be necessary. It is speculated that measures relating to use of language and shared mental models might function as these proxies, but it is also noted that significant further work in this area is required, and more effective proxies may emerge from this.",
keywords = "knowledge exchange, comparative measures, evaluation",
author = "Naomi Jacobs",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "1--4",
note = "The Knowledge Exchange : An Interactive Conference, The KE conference ; Conference date: 25-09-2013 Through 27-09-2013",
url = "http://thecreativeexchange.org/tkex",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Measuring knowledge exchange

AU - Jacobs, Naomi

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - In this paper, the reasons for studying knowledge exchange in the context of design are discussed, including the benefits of knowledge exchange and the contributions that design can bring in improving its implementation. The paper explores why there appears to be a lack of rigorous comparative methods. If such methods were to exist, they would allow for examination of whether certain strategies for improving knowledge exchange processes are more effective than others. A potential solution to this is proposed in the form of knowledge exchange proxies which can be developed to give an objective measurement of successful knowledge exchange, without requiring extensive longitudinal studies which might otherwise be necessary. It is speculated that measures relating to use of language and shared mental models might function as these proxies, but it is also noted that significant further work in this area is required, and more effective proxies may emerge from this.

AB - In this paper, the reasons for studying knowledge exchange in the context of design are discussed, including the benefits of knowledge exchange and the contributions that design can bring in improving its implementation. The paper explores why there appears to be a lack of rigorous comparative methods. If such methods were to exist, they would allow for examination of whether certain strategies for improving knowledge exchange processes are more effective than others. A potential solution to this is proposed in the form of knowledge exchange proxies which can be developed to give an objective measurement of successful knowledge exchange, without requiring extensive longitudinal studies which might otherwise be necessary. It is speculated that measures relating to use of language and shared mental models might function as these proxies, but it is also noted that significant further work in this area is required, and more effective proxies may emerge from this.

KW - knowledge exchange

KW - comparative measures

KW - evaluation

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 4

ER -