Medical students' views of clinical environments

Ruby Roberts, Jennifer Cleland, Pia Strand, Peter Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments (CLEs) is immensely important in medical education. Objective indicators of the quality of the CLE can be used to measure learner perceptions and to inform educational improvements; however, many established tools were not designed for use in clinical settings and are not theoretically grounded. Our aim was to apply a new tool to the new context of a UK setting to explore the perceptions of senior medical students in a number of different CLEs. Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments is immensely important in medical education 

METHODS: The four-factor Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) was translated into English, and used to gather final-year medical students' perceptions of four different specialties they had rotated through: Emergency Medicine (EM), General Surgery (GS), Medicine for the Elderly (ME), and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). The UCEEM was distributed in paper form. Students were asked to complete it in relation to two of the four specialties.

RESULTS/FINDINGS: Year-5 medical students (n = 132) returned a completed UCEEM. For opportunities to learn in and through work experience EM was reported the most positively. ME was perceived to be the most prepared for student entry. Students reported being well received by staff and made to feel part of the team within GS, EM and ME, but less so in O&G.

DISCUSSION: UCEEM appears to be a useful tool for evaluating medical student perceptions of CLEs. Theoretically robust, UCEEM is straightforward to administer and to score. It has the potential to be used by time-pressured educators to collect baseline and comparative data for evaluation and improvement purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalThe Clinical Teacher
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date23 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Learning
Emergency Medicine
Education
Medicine
Students
Medical Education
Gynecology
Obstetrics

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Medical students' views of clinical environments. / Roberts, Ruby; Cleland, Jennifer; Strand, Pia; Johnston, Peter.

In: The Clinical Teacher, Vol. 15, No. 4, 08.2018, p. 325-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, Ruby ; Cleland, Jennifer ; Strand, Pia ; Johnston, Peter. / Medical students' views of clinical environments. In: The Clinical Teacher. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 325-330.
@article{d1ec45f100a44f018530248c6e1d2ee9,
title = "Medical students' views of clinical environments",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments (CLEs) is immensely important in medical education. Objective indicators of the quality of the CLE can be used to measure learner perceptions and to inform educational improvements; however, many established tools were not designed for use in clinical settings and are not theoretically grounded. Our aim was to apply a new tool to the new context of a UK setting to explore the perceptions of senior medical students in a number of different CLEs. Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments is immensely important in medical education METHODS: The four-factor Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) was translated into English, and used to gather final-year medical students' perceptions of four different specialties they had rotated through: Emergency Medicine (EM), General Surgery (GS), Medicine for the Elderly (ME), and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). The UCEEM was distributed in paper form. Students were asked to complete it in relation to two of the four specialties.RESULTS/FINDINGS: Year-5 medical students (n = 132) returned a completed UCEEM. For opportunities to learn in and through work experience EM was reported the most positively. ME was perceived to be the most prepared for student entry. Students reported being well received by staff and made to feel part of the team within GS, EM and ME, but less so in O&G.DISCUSSION: UCEEM appears to be a useful tool for evaluating medical student perceptions of CLEs. Theoretically robust, UCEEM is straightforward to administer and to score. It has the potential to be used by time-pressured educators to collect baseline and comparative data for evaluation and improvement purposes.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Ruby Roberts and Jennifer Cleland and Pia Strand and Peter Johnston",
note = "Funding: This project was co-funded by the Scottish Medical Education Research Consortium (SMERC) and NHS Grampian Endowment Research Grant Programme. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgements: We thank all the students who took part in this project, and Professor Rona Patey, the Lead of the Institute of Education for Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, for her support of this project. Ethical approval: The Chair of the local ethics committee approved this study (CERB/2015/8/1231). Summary",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/tct.12691",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "325--330",
journal = "The Clinical Teacher",
issn = "1743-4971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical students' views of clinical environments

AU - Roberts, Ruby

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

AU - Strand, Pia

AU - Johnston, Peter

N1 - Funding: This project was co-funded by the Scottish Medical Education Research Consortium (SMERC) and NHS Grampian Endowment Research Grant Programme. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgements: We thank all the students who took part in this project, and Professor Rona Patey, the Lead of the Institute of Education for Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, for her support of this project. Ethical approval: The Chair of the local ethics committee approved this study (CERB/2015/8/1231). Summary

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments (CLEs) is immensely important in medical education. Objective indicators of the quality of the CLE can be used to measure learner perceptions and to inform educational improvements; however, many established tools were not designed for use in clinical settings and are not theoretically grounded. Our aim was to apply a new tool to the new context of a UK setting to explore the perceptions of senior medical students in a number of different CLEs. Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments is immensely important in medical education METHODS: The four-factor Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) was translated into English, and used to gather final-year medical students' perceptions of four different specialties they had rotated through: Emergency Medicine (EM), General Surgery (GS), Medicine for the Elderly (ME), and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). The UCEEM was distributed in paper form. Students were asked to complete it in relation to two of the four specialties.RESULTS/FINDINGS: Year-5 medical students (n = 132) returned a completed UCEEM. For opportunities to learn in and through work experience EM was reported the most positively. ME was perceived to be the most prepared for student entry. Students reported being well received by staff and made to feel part of the team within GS, EM and ME, but less so in O&G.DISCUSSION: UCEEM appears to be a useful tool for evaluating medical student perceptions of CLEs. Theoretically robust, UCEEM is straightforward to administer and to score. It has the potential to be used by time-pressured educators to collect baseline and comparative data for evaluation and improvement purposes.

AB - BACKGROUND: Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments (CLEs) is immensely important in medical education. Objective indicators of the quality of the CLE can be used to measure learner perceptions and to inform educational improvements; however, many established tools were not designed for use in clinical settings and are not theoretically grounded. Our aim was to apply a new tool to the new context of a UK setting to explore the perceptions of senior medical students in a number of different CLEs. Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments is immensely important in medical education METHODS: The four-factor Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) was translated into English, and used to gather final-year medical students' perceptions of four different specialties they had rotated through: Emergency Medicine (EM), General Surgery (GS), Medicine for the Elderly (ME), and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). The UCEEM was distributed in paper form. Students were asked to complete it in relation to two of the four specialties.RESULTS/FINDINGS: Year-5 medical students (n = 132) returned a completed UCEEM. For opportunities to learn in and through work experience EM was reported the most positively. ME was perceived to be the most prepared for student entry. Students reported being well received by staff and made to feel part of the team within GS, EM and ME, but less so in O&G.DISCUSSION: UCEEM appears to be a useful tool for evaluating medical student perceptions of CLEs. Theoretically robust, UCEEM is straightforward to administer and to score. It has the potential to be used by time-pressured educators to collect baseline and comparative data for evaluation and improvement purposes.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/tct.12691

DO - 10.1111/tct.12691

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 325

EP - 330

JO - The Clinical Teacher

JF - The Clinical Teacher

SN - 1743-4971

IS - 4

ER -