Merkur on Jung on ethics, mysticism, and religion

Robert A. Segal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Jung’s Ethics, Dan Merkur, a psychoanalyst in Toronto and the author of many books on the Inuit, psychoanalytic theory, mysticism, and drug-induced religious experience, here writes for the first time on Jungian psychology. Merkur is not abandoning Freud for Jung. A Freudian he remains. But he seeks to contrast Jung positively to Freud. Merkur draws scores of contrasts. Some of them are already known, some not. But even when the contrasts are known, Merkur illuminates them. He is especially concerned with the difference between Freud and Jung on the relationship of psychology to religion. Where Freud seeks to replace religion by psychology, Jung seeks to make psychology itself religious. Whether Jung in fact succeeds in tying psychology so tightly to religion, as Merkur contends, is considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-154
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Jungian Studies
Volume10
Issue number2
Early online date15 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Mysticism
Religion and Psychology
Religion
Ethics
Psychology
Psychoanalytic Theory
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • ethics
  • Freud
  • Jung
  • mysticism
  • mythology
  • religion
  • unconscious

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Merkur on Jung on ethics, mysticism, and religion. / Segal, Robert A.

In: International Journal of Jungian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2018, p. 147-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccf40e6c8dd84cf788e9b5438ff53300,
title = "Merkur on Jung on ethics, mysticism, and religion",
abstract = "In Jung’s Ethics, Dan Merkur, a psychoanalyst in Toronto and the author of many books on the Inuit, psychoanalytic theory, mysticism, and drug-induced religious experience, here writes for the first time on Jungian psychology. Merkur is not abandoning Freud for Jung. A Freudian he remains. But he seeks to contrast Jung positively to Freud. Merkur draws scores of contrasts. Some of them are already known, some not. But even when the contrasts are known, Merkur illuminates them. He is especially concerned with the difference between Freud and Jung on the relationship of psychology to religion. Where Freud seeks to replace religion by psychology, Jung seeks to make psychology itself religious. Whether Jung in fact succeeds in tying psychology so tightly to religion, as Merkur contends, is considered.",
keywords = "ethics, Freud, Jung, mysticism, mythology, religion, unconscious",
author = "Segal, {Robert A.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/19409052.2018.1446505",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "147--154",
journal = "International Journal of Jungian Studies",
issn = "1940-9052",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Merkur on Jung on ethics, mysticism, and religion

AU - Segal, Robert A.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In Jung’s Ethics, Dan Merkur, a psychoanalyst in Toronto and the author of many books on the Inuit, psychoanalytic theory, mysticism, and drug-induced religious experience, here writes for the first time on Jungian psychology. Merkur is not abandoning Freud for Jung. A Freudian he remains. But he seeks to contrast Jung positively to Freud. Merkur draws scores of contrasts. Some of them are already known, some not. But even when the contrasts are known, Merkur illuminates them. He is especially concerned with the difference between Freud and Jung on the relationship of psychology to religion. Where Freud seeks to replace religion by psychology, Jung seeks to make psychology itself religious. Whether Jung in fact succeeds in tying psychology so tightly to religion, as Merkur contends, is considered.

AB - In Jung’s Ethics, Dan Merkur, a psychoanalyst in Toronto and the author of many books on the Inuit, psychoanalytic theory, mysticism, and drug-induced religious experience, here writes for the first time on Jungian psychology. Merkur is not abandoning Freud for Jung. A Freudian he remains. But he seeks to contrast Jung positively to Freud. Merkur draws scores of contrasts. Some of them are already known, some not. But even when the contrasts are known, Merkur illuminates them. He is especially concerned with the difference between Freud and Jung on the relationship of psychology to religion. Where Freud seeks to replace religion by psychology, Jung seeks to make psychology itself religious. Whether Jung in fact succeeds in tying psychology so tightly to religion, as Merkur contends, is considered.

KW - ethics

KW - Freud

KW - Jung

KW - mysticism

KW - mythology

KW - religion

KW - unconscious

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044063348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19409052.2018.1446505

DO - 10.1080/19409052.2018.1446505

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 147

EP - 154

JO - International Journal of Jungian Studies

JF - International Journal of Jungian Studies

SN - 1940-9052

IS - 2

ER -