Abstract
Abstract. Scholars in religious studies, or “religionists,” often mischaracterize the social‐scientific study of religion. They assume that a social‐scientific analysis of the origin, function, meaning, or truth of religion either opposes or disregards the believer's analysis, which religionists profess to present and defend. I do not argue that the social sciences analyze religion from the believer's point of view. I argue instead that a social scientific analysis is more akin and germane to the believer's point of view than religionists assume. I single out seven mischaracterizations of the social sciences typically held by religionists.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 263-278 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Zygon® |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 1990 |
Keywords
- believer's point of view
- Berger
- Eliade
- Freud
- function
- irreducibly religious
- meaning
- origin
- social‐scientific