Missing carbon reductions?

Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households

Angela Druckman, Mona Chitnis, Steve Sorrell, Tim Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

190 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Households are expected to play a pivotal role in reducing the UK's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the UK Government is encouraging specific household actions to help meet its targets. However, due to the rebound effect, only a portion of the GHG emission reductions estimated by simple engineering calculations are generally achieved in practice. For example, replacing short car journeys by walking or cycling reduces consumption of motor fuels. But this frees up money that may be spent on, for example, purchasing extra clothes or flying on vacation. Alternatively, the money may be put into savings. Since all of these options lead to GHG emissions, total GHG savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase—a phenomenon known as ‘backfire’. We estimate that the rebound effect for a combination of three abatement actions by UK households is approximately 34%. Targeting re-spending on goods and services with a low GHG intensity reduces this to a minimum of around 12%, while re-spending on goods and services with a high GHG intensity leads to backfire. Our study highlights the importance of shifting consumption to lower GHG intensive categories and investing in low carbon investments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3572-3581
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date29 Apr 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas
Carbon
carbon
Gas emissions
savings
Purchasing
walking
household
effect
targeting
automobile
Railroad cars
engineering

Cite this

Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. / Druckman, Angela; Chitnis, Mona; Sorrell, Steve; Jackson, Tim .

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 3572-3581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Druckman, A, Chitnis, M, Sorrell, S & Jackson, T 2011, 'Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households', Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3572-3581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058
Druckman, Angela ; Chitnis, Mona ; Sorrell, Steve ; Jackson, Tim . / Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. In: Energy Policy. 2011 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 3572-3581.
@article{336bbb4bdd9d4c728ce88687e720f23f,
title = "Missing carbon reductions?: Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households",
abstract = "Households are expected to play a pivotal role in reducing the UK's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the UK Government is encouraging specific household actions to help meet its targets. However, due to the rebound effect, only a portion of the GHG emission reductions estimated by simple engineering calculations are generally achieved in practice. For example, replacing short car journeys by walking or cycling reduces consumption of motor fuels. But this frees up money that may be spent on, for example, purchasing extra clothes or flying on vacation. Alternatively, the money may be put into savings. Since all of these options lead to GHG emissions, total GHG savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase—a phenomenon known as ‘backfire’. We estimate that the rebound effect for a combination of three abatement actions by UK households is approximately 34{\%}. Targeting re-spending on goods and services with a low GHG intensity reduces this to a minimum of around 12{\%}, while re-spending on goods and services with a high GHG intensity leads to backfire. Our study highlights the importance of shifting consumption to lower GHG intensive categories and investing in low carbon investments.",
author = "Angela Druckman and Mona Chitnis and Steve Sorrell and Tim Jackson",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "3572--3581",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing carbon reductions?

T2 - Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households

AU - Druckman, Angela

AU - Chitnis, Mona

AU - Sorrell, Steve

AU - Jackson, Tim

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Households are expected to play a pivotal role in reducing the UK's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the UK Government is encouraging specific household actions to help meet its targets. However, due to the rebound effect, only a portion of the GHG emission reductions estimated by simple engineering calculations are generally achieved in practice. For example, replacing short car journeys by walking or cycling reduces consumption of motor fuels. But this frees up money that may be spent on, for example, purchasing extra clothes or flying on vacation. Alternatively, the money may be put into savings. Since all of these options lead to GHG emissions, total GHG savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase—a phenomenon known as ‘backfire’. We estimate that the rebound effect for a combination of three abatement actions by UK households is approximately 34%. Targeting re-spending on goods and services with a low GHG intensity reduces this to a minimum of around 12%, while re-spending on goods and services with a high GHG intensity leads to backfire. Our study highlights the importance of shifting consumption to lower GHG intensive categories and investing in low carbon investments.

AB - Households are expected to play a pivotal role in reducing the UK's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the UK Government is encouraging specific household actions to help meet its targets. However, due to the rebound effect, only a portion of the GHG emission reductions estimated by simple engineering calculations are generally achieved in practice. For example, replacing short car journeys by walking or cycling reduces consumption of motor fuels. But this frees up money that may be spent on, for example, purchasing extra clothes or flying on vacation. Alternatively, the money may be put into savings. Since all of these options lead to GHG emissions, total GHG savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase—a phenomenon known as ‘backfire’. We estimate that the rebound effect for a combination of three abatement actions by UK households is approximately 34%. Targeting re-spending on goods and services with a low GHG intensity reduces this to a minimum of around 12%, while re-spending on goods and services with a high GHG intensity leads to backfire. Our study highlights the importance of shifting consumption to lower GHG intensive categories and investing in low carbon investments.

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 3572

EP - 3581

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 6

ER -