Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads

which input variables are important?

Flora Gröning, Michael Fagan, Paul O'Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Finite element analyses (FEA) that have simulated masticatory loadings of the human mandible differ significantly with regard to their basic input variables such as material properties, constraints, and applied forces. With sensitivity analyses it is possible to assess how the choice of different input values and the degree of model simplification affect FEA results. However, published FEA studies are rarely accompanied by sensitivity analyses so that the robusticity of their results is impossible to assess. Here, we conduct a sensitivity analysis with an FE model of a human mandible to quantify the relative importance of several modeling decisions: (1) the material properties assigned to the cancellous bone tissue; (2) the inclusion or not of the periodontal ligament; (3) the constraints at the joints and bite point; and (4) the orientation of applied muscle forces. We study the effects of varying these properties by analysing the strain magnitudes and directions across the model surface. In addition, we perform a geometric morphometric analysis of the deformation resulting from the loading of each model. The results show that the effects of altering the different model properties can be significant and that most effects are potentially large enough to cause problems for the biological interpretation of FEA results. We therefore recommend that researchers conduct more sensitivity analyses than at present to assess the robusticity of their FEA results and their biological conclusions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-63
Number of pages11
JournalThe Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology
Volume295
Issue number5
Early online date30 Mar 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Finite Element Analysis
mandible (bone)
Mandible
modeling
Periodontal Ligament
Decision Support Techniques
Bites and Stings
sensitivity analysis
ligaments
bone
muscle
joints (animal)
Joints
Research Personnel
Bone and Bones
researchers
Muscles
bones
muscles
effect

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • bite force
  • computer simulation
  • elastic modulus
  • finite element analysis
  • humans
  • mandible
  • mastication
  • masticatory muscles
  • models, anatomic
  • periodontal ligament
  • principal component analysis
  • reproducibility of results
  • stress, mechanical
  • temporomandibular joint
  • tomography, X-ray computed

Cite this

Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads : which input variables are important? / Gröning, Flora; Fagan, Michael; O'Higgins, Paul.

In: The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 295, No. 5, 05.2012, p. 853-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46cb596622b24e878f66737b492ec632,
title = "Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads: which input variables are important?",
abstract = "Finite element analyses (FEA) that have simulated masticatory loadings of the human mandible differ significantly with regard to their basic input variables such as material properties, constraints, and applied forces. With sensitivity analyses it is possible to assess how the choice of different input values and the degree of model simplification affect FEA results. However, published FEA studies are rarely accompanied by sensitivity analyses so that the robusticity of their results is impossible to assess. Here, we conduct a sensitivity analysis with an FE model of a human mandible to quantify the relative importance of several modeling decisions: (1) the material properties assigned to the cancellous bone tissue; (2) the inclusion or not of the periodontal ligament; (3) the constraints at the joints and bite point; and (4) the orientation of applied muscle forces. We study the effects of varying these properties by analysing the strain magnitudes and directions across the model surface. In addition, we perform a geometric morphometric analysis of the deformation resulting from the loading of each model. The results show that the effects of altering the different model properties can be significant and that most effects are potentially large enough to cause problems for the biological interpretation of FEA results. We therefore recommend that researchers conduct more sensitivity analyses than at present to assess the robusticity of their FEA results and their biological conclusions.",
keywords = "biomechanics, bite force, computer simulation, elastic modulus, finite element analysis, humans, mandible, mastication, masticatory muscles, models, anatomic, periodontal ligament, principal component analysis, reproducibility of results, stress, mechanical, temporomandibular joint, tomography, X-ray computed",
author = "Flora Gr{\"o}ning and Michael Fagan and Paul O'Higgins",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/ar.22455",
language = "English",
volume = "295",
pages = "853--63",
journal = "The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1932-8494",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the human mandible under masticatory loads

T2 - which input variables are important?

AU - Gröning, Flora

AU - Fagan, Michael

AU - O'Higgins, Paul

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Finite element analyses (FEA) that have simulated masticatory loadings of the human mandible differ significantly with regard to their basic input variables such as material properties, constraints, and applied forces. With sensitivity analyses it is possible to assess how the choice of different input values and the degree of model simplification affect FEA results. However, published FEA studies are rarely accompanied by sensitivity analyses so that the robusticity of their results is impossible to assess. Here, we conduct a sensitivity analysis with an FE model of a human mandible to quantify the relative importance of several modeling decisions: (1) the material properties assigned to the cancellous bone tissue; (2) the inclusion or not of the periodontal ligament; (3) the constraints at the joints and bite point; and (4) the orientation of applied muscle forces. We study the effects of varying these properties by analysing the strain magnitudes and directions across the model surface. In addition, we perform a geometric morphometric analysis of the deformation resulting from the loading of each model. The results show that the effects of altering the different model properties can be significant and that most effects are potentially large enough to cause problems for the biological interpretation of FEA results. We therefore recommend that researchers conduct more sensitivity analyses than at present to assess the robusticity of their FEA results and their biological conclusions.

AB - Finite element analyses (FEA) that have simulated masticatory loadings of the human mandible differ significantly with regard to their basic input variables such as material properties, constraints, and applied forces. With sensitivity analyses it is possible to assess how the choice of different input values and the degree of model simplification affect FEA results. However, published FEA studies are rarely accompanied by sensitivity analyses so that the robusticity of their results is impossible to assess. Here, we conduct a sensitivity analysis with an FE model of a human mandible to quantify the relative importance of several modeling decisions: (1) the material properties assigned to the cancellous bone tissue; (2) the inclusion or not of the periodontal ligament; (3) the constraints at the joints and bite point; and (4) the orientation of applied muscle forces. We study the effects of varying these properties by analysing the strain magnitudes and directions across the model surface. In addition, we perform a geometric morphometric analysis of the deformation resulting from the loading of each model. The results show that the effects of altering the different model properties can be significant and that most effects are potentially large enough to cause problems for the biological interpretation of FEA results. We therefore recommend that researchers conduct more sensitivity analyses than at present to assess the robusticity of their FEA results and their biological conclusions.

KW - biomechanics

KW - bite force

KW - computer simulation

KW - elastic modulus

KW - finite element analysis

KW - humans

KW - mandible

KW - mastication

KW - masticatory muscles

KW - models, anatomic

KW - periodontal ligament

KW - principal component analysis

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - stress, mechanical

KW - temporomandibular joint

KW - tomography, X-ray computed

U2 - 10.1002/ar.22455

DO - 10.1002/ar.22455

M3 - Article

VL - 295

SP - 853

EP - 863

JO - The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology

JF - The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1932-8494

IS - 5

ER -