Motive and opportunity

British Christian parties 1997-2011

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The absence from Britain of anything like the United States New Christian Right of the 1980s could be explained by differences in the popularity of religion or in features of the respective party and political structures. Devolution and electoral reform have encouraged British Christians to form political parties and contest elections. Examination of their performance, agendas, and candidate profiles, coupled with survey data on British attitudes to mixing religion and politics, suggests that the major difference between the United States and Britain lies in the degree of secularization rather than in political opportunity structures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-24
Number of pages22
JournalPolitics and Religion
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date27 Feb 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Religion
Christian Right
Electoral Reform
Political Parties
Contests
1980s
Devolution
Secularization
Agenda
Political Structure
Survey Data
Elections

Cite this

Motive and opportunity : British Christian parties 1997-2011. / Bruce, Steve.

In: Politics and Religion, Vol. 6, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 3-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9687f3cfa4b14274a14601bc9bb5ba14,
title = "Motive and opportunity: British Christian parties 1997-2011",
abstract = "The absence from Britain of anything like the United States New Christian Right of the 1980s could be explained by differences in the popularity of religion or in features of the respective party and political structures. Devolution and electoral reform have encouraged British Christians to form political parties and contest elections. Examination of their performance, agendas, and candidate profiles, coupled with survey data on British attitudes to mixing religion and politics, suggests that the major difference between the United States and Britain lies in the degree of secularization rather than in political opportunity structures.",
author = "Steve Bruce",
note = "I am grateful to the Leverhulme Trust that supported my research with a Senior Research Fellowship from 2007 to 2009 and to Tony Glendinning for his part in our collaborative work on attitudes to the public presence of religion.",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S1755048312000624",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "3--24",
journal = "Politics and Religion",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motive and opportunity

T2 - British Christian parties 1997-2011

AU - Bruce, Steve

N1 - I am grateful to the Leverhulme Trust that supported my research with a Senior Research Fellowship from 2007 to 2009 and to Tony Glendinning for his part in our collaborative work on attitudes to the public presence of religion.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The absence from Britain of anything like the United States New Christian Right of the 1980s could be explained by differences in the popularity of religion or in features of the respective party and political structures. Devolution and electoral reform have encouraged British Christians to form political parties and contest elections. Examination of their performance, agendas, and candidate profiles, coupled with survey data on British attitudes to mixing religion and politics, suggests that the major difference between the United States and Britain lies in the degree of secularization rather than in political opportunity structures.

AB - The absence from Britain of anything like the United States New Christian Right of the 1980s could be explained by differences in the popularity of religion or in features of the respective party and political structures. Devolution and electoral reform have encouraged British Christians to form political parties and contest elections. Examination of their performance, agendas, and candidate profiles, coupled with survey data on British attitudes to mixing religion and politics, suggests that the major difference between the United States and Britain lies in the degree of secularization rather than in political opportunity structures.

U2 - 10.1017/S1755048312000624

DO - 10.1017/S1755048312000624

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 3

EP - 24

JO - Politics and Religion

JF - Politics and Religion

IS - 1

ER -