Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland

Kathrin Fuchs* (Corresponding Author), Lutz Merbold, Nina Buchmann, Daniel Bretscher, Lorenzo Brilli, Nuala Fitton, Cairistiona F. E. Topp, Katja Klumpp, Mark Lieffering, Raphaël Martin, Paul C D Newton, Robert M. Rees, Susanne Rolinski, Pete Smith, Val Snow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Process‐based models are useful for assessing the impact of changing management practices and climate on yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems such as grasslands. They can be used to construct national GHG inventories using a Tier 3 approach. However, accurate simulations of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes remain challenging. Models are limited by our understanding of soil‐plant‐microbe interactions and the impact of uncertainty in measured input parameters on simulated outputs. To improve model performance, thorough evaluations against in situ measurements are needed. Experimental data of N2O emissions under two management practices (control with typical fertilization versus increased clover and no fertilization) were acquired in a Swiss field experiment. We conducted a multi‐model evaluation with three commonly‐used biogeochemical models (DayCent in two variants, PaSim, APSIM in two variants) comparing four years of data. DayCent was the most accurate model for simulating N2O fluxes on annual timescales, while APSIM was most accurate for daily N2O fluxes. The multi‐model ensemble average reduced the error in estimated annual fluxes by 41% compared to an estimate using the IPCC derived method for the Swiss agricultural GHG inventory (IPCC‐Swiss), but individual models were not systematically more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss. The model ensemble overestimated the N2O mitigation effect of the clover‐based treatment (measured: 39‐45%; ensemble: 52‐57%) but was more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss (IPCC‐Swiss: 72‐81%). These results suggest that multi‐model ensembles are valuable for estimating the impact of climate and management on N2O emissions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences
Early online date18 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

nitrous oxide
grassland
greenhouse gas
management practice
climate
evaluation
farming system
in situ measurement
mitigation
timescale
simulation

Keywords

  • model validation
  • process‐based modeling
  • biogeochemical modelling
  • eddy covariance
  • DayCent
  • APSIM
  • PaSim

Cite this

Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland. / Fuchs, Kathrin (Corresponding Author); Merbold, Lutz; Buchmann, Nina; Bretscher, Daniel ; Brilli, Lorenzo ; Fitton, Nuala; Topp, Cairistiona F. E.; Klumpp, Katja; Lieffering, Mark; Martin, Raphaël ; Newton, Paul C D ; Rees, Robert M.; Rolinski, Susanne; Smith, Pete; Snow, Val.

In: Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences, 18.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fuchs, K, Merbold, L, Buchmann, N, Bretscher, D, Brilli, L, Fitton, N, Topp, CFE, Klumpp, K, Lieffering, M, Martin, R, Newton, PCD, Rees, RM, Rolinski, S, Smith, P & Snow, V 2019, 'Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland', Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005261
Fuchs, Kathrin ; Merbold, Lutz ; Buchmann, Nina ; Bretscher, Daniel ; Brilli, Lorenzo ; Fitton, Nuala ; Topp, Cairistiona F. E. ; Klumpp, Katja ; Lieffering, Mark ; Martin, Raphaël ; Newton, Paul C D ; Rees, Robert M. ; Rolinski, Susanne ; Smith, Pete ; Snow, Val. / Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland. In: Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences. 2019.
@article{0132352d6b524631a0de5c9e54fe313c,
title = "Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland",
abstract = "Process‐based models are useful for assessing the impact of changing management practices and climate on yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems such as grasslands. They can be used to construct national GHG inventories using a Tier 3 approach. However, accurate simulations of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes remain challenging. Models are limited by our understanding of soil‐plant‐microbe interactions and the impact of uncertainty in measured input parameters on simulated outputs. To improve model performance, thorough evaluations against in situ measurements are needed. Experimental data of N2O emissions under two management practices (control with typical fertilization versus increased clover and no fertilization) were acquired in a Swiss field experiment. We conducted a multi‐model evaluation with three commonly‐used biogeochemical models (DayCent in two variants, PaSim, APSIM in two variants) comparing four years of data. DayCent was the most accurate model for simulating N2O fluxes on annual timescales, while APSIM was most accurate for daily N2O fluxes. The multi‐model ensemble average reduced the error in estimated annual fluxes by 41{\%} compared to an estimate using the IPCC derived method for the Swiss agricultural GHG inventory (IPCC‐Swiss), but individual models were not systematically more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss. The model ensemble overestimated the N2O mitigation effect of the clover‐based treatment (measured: 39‐45{\%}; ensemble: 52‐57{\%}) but was more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss (IPCC‐Swiss: 72‐81{\%}). These results suggest that multi‐model ensembles are valuable for estimating the impact of climate and management on N2O emissions.",
keywords = "model validation, process‐based modeling, biogeochemical modelling, eddy covariance, DayCent, APSIM, PaSim",
author = "Kathrin Fuchs and Lutz Merbold and Nina Buchmann and Daniel Bretscher and Lorenzo Brilli and Nuala Fitton and Topp, {Cairistiona F. E.} and Katja Klumpp and Mark Lieffering and Rapha{\"e}l Martin and Newton, {Paul C D} and Rees, {Robert M.} and Susanne Rolinski and Pete Smith and Val Snow",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1029/2019JG005261",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences",
issn = "2169-8953",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi–model evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland

AU - Fuchs, Kathrin

AU - Merbold, Lutz

AU - Buchmann, Nina

AU - Bretscher, Daniel

AU - Brilli, Lorenzo

AU - Fitton, Nuala

AU - Topp, Cairistiona F. E.

AU - Klumpp, Katja

AU - Lieffering, Mark

AU - Martin, Raphaël

AU - Newton, Paul C D

AU - Rees, Robert M.

AU - Rolinski, Susanne

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Snow, Val

PY - 2019/12/18

Y1 - 2019/12/18

N2 - Process‐based models are useful for assessing the impact of changing management practices and climate on yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems such as grasslands. They can be used to construct national GHG inventories using a Tier 3 approach. However, accurate simulations of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes remain challenging. Models are limited by our understanding of soil‐plant‐microbe interactions and the impact of uncertainty in measured input parameters on simulated outputs. To improve model performance, thorough evaluations against in situ measurements are needed. Experimental data of N2O emissions under two management practices (control with typical fertilization versus increased clover and no fertilization) were acquired in a Swiss field experiment. We conducted a multi‐model evaluation with three commonly‐used biogeochemical models (DayCent in two variants, PaSim, APSIM in two variants) comparing four years of data. DayCent was the most accurate model for simulating N2O fluxes on annual timescales, while APSIM was most accurate for daily N2O fluxes. The multi‐model ensemble average reduced the error in estimated annual fluxes by 41% compared to an estimate using the IPCC derived method for the Swiss agricultural GHG inventory (IPCC‐Swiss), but individual models were not systematically more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss. The model ensemble overestimated the N2O mitigation effect of the clover‐based treatment (measured: 39‐45%; ensemble: 52‐57%) but was more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss (IPCC‐Swiss: 72‐81%). These results suggest that multi‐model ensembles are valuable for estimating the impact of climate and management on N2O emissions.

AB - Process‐based models are useful for assessing the impact of changing management practices and climate on yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems such as grasslands. They can be used to construct national GHG inventories using a Tier 3 approach. However, accurate simulations of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes remain challenging. Models are limited by our understanding of soil‐plant‐microbe interactions and the impact of uncertainty in measured input parameters on simulated outputs. To improve model performance, thorough evaluations against in situ measurements are needed. Experimental data of N2O emissions under two management practices (control with typical fertilization versus increased clover and no fertilization) were acquired in a Swiss field experiment. We conducted a multi‐model evaluation with three commonly‐used biogeochemical models (DayCent in two variants, PaSim, APSIM in two variants) comparing four years of data. DayCent was the most accurate model for simulating N2O fluxes on annual timescales, while APSIM was most accurate for daily N2O fluxes. The multi‐model ensemble average reduced the error in estimated annual fluxes by 41% compared to an estimate using the IPCC derived method for the Swiss agricultural GHG inventory (IPCC‐Swiss), but individual models were not systematically more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss. The model ensemble overestimated the N2O mitigation effect of the clover‐based treatment (measured: 39‐45%; ensemble: 52‐57%) but was more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss (IPCC‐Swiss: 72‐81%). These results suggest that multi‐model ensembles are valuable for estimating the impact of climate and management on N2O emissions.

KW - model validation

KW - process‐based modeling

KW - biogeochemical modelling

KW - eddy covariance

KW - DayCent

KW - APSIM

KW - PaSim

U2 - 10.1029/2019JG005261

DO - 10.1029/2019JG005261

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences

JF - Journal of geophysical research-Biogeosciences

SN - 2169-8953

ER -