Abstract
Network meta-analysis allows researchers to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence, thus enabling simultaneous comparisons of multiple treatments. A relatively recent addition to evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine, this approach has become increasingly popular. Yet, the underlying assumptions of network meta-analyses, which drive the validity of their findings, have been frequently ignored. In this article, we discuss the strengths and limitations of network meta-analyses. In addition, we present an overview of published network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine, summarize their challenges and provide insights into future research opportunities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1723-1731 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Human reproduction (Oxford, England) |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 14 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2020 |
Keywords
- certainty of evidence
- evidence synthesis
- infertility
- meta-analysis
- network meta-analysis
- reporting
- reproductive medicine
- systematic review
- transitivity