Normalisation process theory

a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

Elizabeth Murray*, Shaun Treweek, Catherine Pope, Anne MacFarlane, Luciana Ballini, Christopher Dowrick, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, Frances Mair, Catherine O'Donnell, Bie Nio Ong, Tim Rapley, Anne Rogers, Carl May

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

257 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation).

Discussion: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential.

Summary: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial.

Original languageEnglish
Article number63
Number of pages11
JournalBMC medicine
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2010

Keywords

  • policy
  • behavior
  • care
  • trials
  • recruitment

Cite this

Normalisation process theory : a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. / Murray, Elizabeth; Treweek, Shaun; Pope, Catherine; MacFarlane, Anne; Ballini, Luciana; Dowrick, Christopher; Finch, Tracy; Kennedy, Anne; Mair, Frances; O'Donnell, Catherine; Ong, Bie Nio; Rapley, Tim; Rogers, Anne; May, Carl.

In: BMC medicine , Vol. 8, 63, 20.10.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murray, E, Treweek, S, Pope, C, MacFarlane, A, Ballini, L, Dowrick, C, Finch, T, Kennedy, A, Mair, F, O'Donnell, C, Ong, BN, Rapley, T, Rogers, A & May, C 2010, 'Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions', BMC medicine , vol. 8, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-63
Murray, Elizabeth ; Treweek, Shaun ; Pope, Catherine ; MacFarlane, Anne ; Ballini, Luciana ; Dowrick, Christopher ; Finch, Tracy ; Kennedy, Anne ; Mair, Frances ; O'Donnell, Catherine ; Ong, Bie Nio ; Rapley, Tim ; Rogers, Anne ; May, Carl. / Normalisation process theory : a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. In: BMC medicine . 2010 ; Vol. 8.
@article{7493770580de491da562c07c343bfea4,
title = "Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions",
abstract = "Background: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation).Discussion: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential.Summary: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial.",
keywords = "policy, behavior, care, trials, recruitment",
author = "Elizabeth Murray and Shaun Treweek and Catherine Pope and Anne MacFarlane and Luciana Ballini and Christopher Dowrick and Tracy Finch and Anne Kennedy and Frances Mair and Catherine O'Donnell and Ong, {Bie Nio} and Tim Rapley and Anne Rogers and Carl May",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/1741-7015-8-63",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC medicine",
issn = "1741-7015",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalisation process theory

T2 - a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions

AU - Murray, Elizabeth

AU - Treweek, Shaun

AU - Pope, Catherine

AU - MacFarlane, Anne

AU - Ballini, Luciana

AU - Dowrick, Christopher

AU - Finch, Tracy

AU - Kennedy, Anne

AU - Mair, Frances

AU - O'Donnell, Catherine

AU - Ong, Bie Nio

AU - Rapley, Tim

AU - Rogers, Anne

AU - May, Carl

PY - 2010/10/20

Y1 - 2010/10/20

N2 - Background: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation).Discussion: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential.Summary: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial.

AB - Background: The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation).Discussion: In this paper, we suggest that the NPT can act as a sensitising tool, enabling researchers to think through issues of implementation while designing a complex intervention and its evaluation. The need to ensure trial procedures that are feasible and compatible with clinical practice is not limited to trials of complex interventions, and NPT may improve trial design by highlighting potential problems with recruitment or data collection, as well as ensuring the intervention has good implementation potential.Summary: The NPT is a new theory which offers trialists a consistent framework that can be used to describe, assess and enhance implementation potential. We encourage trialists to consider using it in their next trial.

KW - policy

KW - behavior

KW - care

KW - trials

KW - recruitment

U2 - 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63

DO - 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMC medicine

JF - BMC medicine

SN - 1741-7015

M1 - 63

ER -