'Not to Abolish, but to Fulfill'

The Person of the Preacher and the Claim of the Sermon on the Mount

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The claims of Mt. 5:17–20 are often taken to provide the interpretive key to the
ethical claims of the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. The theological issue
at stake here is the determinative relation between Christ’s person and work
and his teaching. This article explores the vital role played by the identity of
Christ as the ‘fulfiller of the law’ and ‘bringer of the Kingdom’ in the exegesis
of the Sermon offered by Eduard Thurneysen and Dietrich Bonhoeffer in
their respective works Die Bergpredigt (1936) and Nachfolge (1937).
Both readings assert that the force and nature of the claims of the Sermon
cannot be understood aright apart from constant attention to the difference
made by the fact that Christ is the preacher. Out of this shared conviction,
both theologians advance a reading of the Sermon as ‘the gospel itself’ in the
light of the eschatological identity of Jesus. Such readings of the Sermon,
arising amidst the German Kirchenkampf of the 1930s, represent substantial
contributions to the ‘responsible interpretation’ of the Barmen Declaration
(1934) whose second article states that, ‘As Jesus Christ is God’s assurance
of the forgiveness of all our sins, so in the same way and with the same
seriousness is he also God’s mighty claim upon our whole life.’
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-289
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in Christian Ethics
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Person
Sermon on the Mount
Sermons
Preacher
Jesus
Christ
Deity
Conviction
Determinatives
Teaching
Forgiveness
Declaration
Stakes
1930s
Eschatology
Gospel
Kingdom
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Theologians

Cite this

'Not to Abolish, but to Fulfill' : The Person of the Preacher and the Claim of the Sermon on the Mount. / Ziegler, Philip G.

In: Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 08.2009, p. 275-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7cc12ef4e9e45fda54ee5acbbc1fc61,
title = "'Not to Abolish, but to Fulfill': The Person of the Preacher and the Claim of the Sermon on the Mount",
abstract = "The claims of Mt. 5:17–20 are often taken to provide the interpretive key to the ethical claims of the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. The theological issue at stake here is the determinative relation between Christ’s person and work and his teaching. This article explores the vital role played by the identity of Christ as the ‘fulfiller of the law’ and ‘bringer of the Kingdom’ in the exegesis of the Sermon offered by Eduard Thurneysen and Dietrich Bonhoeffer in their respective works Die Bergpredigt (1936) and Nachfolge (1937). Both readings assert that the force and nature of the claims of the Sermon cannot be understood aright apart from constant attention to the difference made by the fact that Christ is the preacher. Out of this shared conviction, both theologians advance a reading of the Sermon as ‘the gospel itself’ in the light of the eschatological identity of Jesus. Such readings of the Sermon, arising amidst the German Kirchenkampf of the 1930s, represent substantial contributions to the ‘responsible interpretation’ of the Barmen Declaration (1934) whose second article states that, ‘As Jesus Christ is God’s assurance of the forgiveness of all our sins, so in the same way and with the same seriousness is he also God’s mighty claim upon our whole life.’",
author = "Ziegler, {Philip G}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0953946809106233",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "275--289",
journal = "Studies in Christian Ethics",
issn = "0953-9468",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Not to Abolish, but to Fulfill'

T2 - The Person of the Preacher and the Claim of the Sermon on the Mount

AU - Ziegler, Philip G

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - The claims of Mt. 5:17–20 are often taken to provide the interpretive key to the ethical claims of the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. The theological issue at stake here is the determinative relation between Christ’s person and work and his teaching. This article explores the vital role played by the identity of Christ as the ‘fulfiller of the law’ and ‘bringer of the Kingdom’ in the exegesis of the Sermon offered by Eduard Thurneysen and Dietrich Bonhoeffer in their respective works Die Bergpredigt (1936) and Nachfolge (1937). Both readings assert that the force and nature of the claims of the Sermon cannot be understood aright apart from constant attention to the difference made by the fact that Christ is the preacher. Out of this shared conviction, both theologians advance a reading of the Sermon as ‘the gospel itself’ in the light of the eschatological identity of Jesus. Such readings of the Sermon, arising amidst the German Kirchenkampf of the 1930s, represent substantial contributions to the ‘responsible interpretation’ of the Barmen Declaration (1934) whose second article states that, ‘As Jesus Christ is God’s assurance of the forgiveness of all our sins, so in the same way and with the same seriousness is he also God’s mighty claim upon our whole life.’

AB - The claims of Mt. 5:17–20 are often taken to provide the interpretive key to the ethical claims of the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. The theological issue at stake here is the determinative relation between Christ’s person and work and his teaching. This article explores the vital role played by the identity of Christ as the ‘fulfiller of the law’ and ‘bringer of the Kingdom’ in the exegesis of the Sermon offered by Eduard Thurneysen and Dietrich Bonhoeffer in their respective works Die Bergpredigt (1936) and Nachfolge (1937). Both readings assert that the force and nature of the claims of the Sermon cannot be understood aright apart from constant attention to the difference made by the fact that Christ is the preacher. Out of this shared conviction, both theologians advance a reading of the Sermon as ‘the gospel itself’ in the light of the eschatological identity of Jesus. Such readings of the Sermon, arising amidst the German Kirchenkampf of the 1930s, represent substantial contributions to the ‘responsible interpretation’ of the Barmen Declaration (1934) whose second article states that, ‘As Jesus Christ is God’s assurance of the forgiveness of all our sins, so in the same way and with the same seriousness is he also God’s mighty claim upon our whole life.’

U2 - 10.1177/0953946809106233

DO - 10.1177/0953946809106233

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 275

EP - 289

JO - Studies in Christian Ethics

JF - Studies in Christian Ethics

SN - 0953-9468

IS - 3

ER -