Open access publishing: A service or a detriment to science?

Graham J. Pierce (Corresponding Author), Ioannis Theodossiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of open access publishing from the perspectives of authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to publishing, the rise in predatory journals and de gradation of quality control, and the consequent potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. Given the recognised importance of 'crafting the message', i.e. communicating scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked why the 'one size fits all' solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (which usually follow the standard format of scientific papers, which remains off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary. There is a need for greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, avoiding predatory journals and promoting benign open access options, and ensuring that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of the unexpected negative impacts of unregulated open access publishing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-48
Number of pages12
JournalEthics in Science and Environmental Politics
Volume18
Early online date17 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

open access
science
quality control
ownership
services
Open Access
Detriment
damage
damages
economics
cost
funding
costs

Keywords

  • Costs
  • Open access
  • Perception
  • Reputation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Ecology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{c5a28db825824624a1c274aad9eec354,
title = "Open access publishing: A service or a detriment to science?",
abstract = "The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of open access publishing from the perspectives of authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to publishing, the rise in predatory journals and de gradation of quality control, and the consequent potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. Given the recognised importance of 'crafting the message', i.e. communicating scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked why the 'one size fits all' solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (which usually follow the standard format of scientific papers, which remains off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary. There is a need for greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, avoiding predatory journals and promoting benign open access options, and ensuring that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of the unexpected negative impacts of unregulated open access publishing.",
keywords = "Costs, Open access, Perception, Reputation",
author = "Pierce, {Graham J.} and Ioannis Theodossiou",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.3354/esep00184",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "37--48",
journal = "Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics",
issn = "1611-8014",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open access publishing

T2 - A service or a detriment to science?

AU - Pierce, Graham J.

AU - Theodossiou, Ioannis

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of open access publishing from the perspectives of authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to publishing, the rise in predatory journals and de gradation of quality control, and the consequent potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. Given the recognised importance of 'crafting the message', i.e. communicating scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked why the 'one size fits all' solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (which usually follow the standard format of scientific papers, which remains off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary. There is a need for greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, avoiding predatory journals and promoting benign open access options, and ensuring that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of the unexpected negative impacts of unregulated open access publishing.

AB - The unintended negative consequences of the drive towards open access publishing are becoming increasingly apparent. This paper examines the nature of open access publishing from the perspectives of authors and readers, considering issues of payment and ownership, and the question of open access for data. It discusses the origins of open access, its costs and the extent to which delivers on its aims, and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, including economic restrictions on access to publishing, the rise in predatory journals and de gradation of quality control, and the consequent potential of open access to damage the standing of science in society. Given the recognised importance of 'crafting the message', i.e. communicating scientific results to each category of end-users in the most appropriate way, it should also be asked why the 'one size fits all' solution of publishing results in open access journal papers (which usually follow the standard format of scientific papers, which remains off-putting to the casual reader) is considered necessary. There is a need for greater rigour in choice of publication outlets, avoiding predatory journals and promoting benign open access options, and ensuring that funding bodies and policymakers are aware of the unexpected negative impacts of unregulated open access publishing.

KW - Costs

KW - Open access

KW - Perception

KW - Reputation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055562212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3354/esep00184

DO - 10.3354/esep00184

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 37

EP - 48

JO - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics

JF - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics

SN - 1611-8014

ER -