Opening the black box of selection

Sanne Schreurs* (Corresponding Author), Kitty Cleutjens, Carlos F Collares, Jennifer Cleland, Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Medical school selection is currently in the paradoxical situation in which selection tools may predict study outcomes, but which constructs are actually doing the predicting is unknown (the 'black box of selection'). Therefore, our research focused on those constructs, answering the question: do the internal structures of the tests in an outcome-based selection procedure reflect the content that was intended to be measured? Downing's validity framework was applied to organize evidence for construct validity, focusing on evidence related to content and internal structure. The applied selection procedure was a multi-tool, CanMEDS-based procedure comprised of a video-based situational judgement test (focused on (inter)personal competencies), and a written aptitude test (reflecting a broader array of CanMEDS competencies). First, we examined content-related evidence pertaining to the creation and application of the competency-based selection blueprint and found that the set-up of the selection procedure was a robust, transparent and replicable process. Second, the internal structure of the selection tests was investigated by connecting applicants' performance on the selection tests to the predetermined blueprint using cognitive diagnostic modeling. The data indicate 89% overlap between the expected and measured constructs. Our results support the notion that the focus placed on creating the right content and following a competency-blueprint was effective in terms of internal structure: most items measured what they were intended to measure. This way of linking a predetermined blueprint to the applicants' results sheds light into the 'black box of selection' and can be used to support the construct validity of selection procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-382
Number of pages20
JournalAdvances in Health Sciences Education
Volume25
Early online date9 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Selection
  • Medical School
  • Admissions
  • Construct validity
  • Validity
  • Medical school
  • MULTIPLE MINI-INTERVIEWS
  • ATTRIBUTES
  • TESTS
  • COMPETENCES
  • VALIDATION
  • LEVEL
  • SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST
  • MODELS
  • PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY
  • MEDICAL-SCHOOL

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Schreurs, S., Cleutjens, K., Collares, C. F., Cleland, J., & Oude Egbrink, M. G. A. (2020). Opening the black box of selection. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25, 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09925-1