Pharisaic Dominance Before 70 CE and the Gospels’ Hypocrisy Charge (Matt 23:2-3)

Steven Neil (Steve) Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract


The following study treats two distinct but related questions. First, were the Pharisees the dominant party in Palestinian Judaism before the destruction of the temple? And second, did Jesus of Nazareth engage in controversy with them? Many scholars today would answer one or both of these questions negatively. My thesis, however, is that both should be answered affirmatively and, further, that it was precisely the status of the Pharisees as the dominant party that makes intelligible Jesus' charge of hypocrisy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-381
Number of pages19
JournalHarvard Theological Review
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Hypocrisy
Jesus
Pharisees
Gospel
Judaism
Palestinians
Temple
Destruction

Cite this

Pharisaic Dominance Before 70 CE and the Gospels’ Hypocrisy Charge (Matt 23:2-3). / Mason, Steven Neil (Steve).

In: Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, 1990, p. 363-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mason, Steven Neil (Steve). / Pharisaic Dominance Before 70 CE and the Gospels’ Hypocrisy Charge (Matt 23:2-3). In: Harvard Theological Review. 1990 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 363-381.
@article{5aba3f34984a450d8d9e90ed548758fc,
title = "Pharisaic Dominance Before 70 CE and the Gospels’ Hypocrisy Charge (Matt 23:2-3)",
abstract = "The following study treats two distinct but related questions. First, were the Pharisees the dominant party in Palestinian Judaism before the destruction of the temple? And second, did Jesus of Nazareth engage in controversy with them? Many scholars today would answer one or both of these questions negatively. My thesis, however, is that both should be answered affirmatively and, further, that it was precisely the status of the Pharisees as the dominant party that makes intelligible Jesus' charge of hypocrisy.",
author = "Mason, {Steven Neil (Steve)}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1017/S0017816000023841",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "363--381",
journal = "Harvard Theological Review",
issn = "0017-8160",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharisaic Dominance Before 70 CE and the Gospels’ Hypocrisy Charge (Matt 23:2-3)

AU - Mason, Steven Neil (Steve)

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The following study treats two distinct but related questions. First, were the Pharisees the dominant party in Palestinian Judaism before the destruction of the temple? And second, did Jesus of Nazareth engage in controversy with them? Many scholars today would answer one or both of these questions negatively. My thesis, however, is that both should be answered affirmatively and, further, that it was precisely the status of the Pharisees as the dominant party that makes intelligible Jesus' charge of hypocrisy.

AB - The following study treats two distinct but related questions. First, were the Pharisees the dominant party in Palestinian Judaism before the destruction of the temple? And second, did Jesus of Nazareth engage in controversy with them? Many scholars today would answer one or both of these questions negatively. My thesis, however, is that both should be answered affirmatively and, further, that it was precisely the status of the Pharisees as the dominant party that makes intelligible Jesus' charge of hypocrisy.

U2 - 10.1017/S0017816000023841

DO - 10.1017/S0017816000023841

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 363

EP - 381

JO - Harvard Theological Review

JF - Harvard Theological Review

SN - 0017-8160

IS - 4

ER -