Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value

George Boyne*, Julian Gould-Williams, Jennifer Law, Richard Walker

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    81 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The current UK government emphasizes the importance of mechanisms of accountability that involve the planning and public reporting of performance. One example of this is the Best Value performance plan. However, there has been little evaluation of the quality of the information provided in this type of document. This paper draws on literature on stakeholding and user needs to identify the data required for accountability. It then assesses whether the plans produced by Best Value pilot authorities in Wales provide appropriate information. The analysis shows that very few of the plans contained the relevant material. Interviews in the pilot authorities highlighted two key reasons for the poor level of data: a lack of performance indicators prior to Best Value and limited staff expertise in performance measurement. The evidence suggests that documents such as performance plans currently make little contribution to the accountability of public organizations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)691-710
    Number of pages20
    JournalPublic Administration
    Volume80
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Plans, performance information and accountability: The case of best value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this