Political decision making, governance shifts and Scottish animal reintroductions

are democratic principles at stake?

Koen Arts*, Anke Fischer, René van der Wal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary governance systems have been characterised as 'multi-actor' and 'multi-level', but the consequences of such greater complexity for core principles of democracy remain uncertain. To investigate the effects of these late-modern governance shifts, we used political decision making on Scottish reintroductions of charismatic animals as a case study. Based on interviews with key actors engaged in the reintroduction of the white-tailed eagle, beaver and (potentially) lynx, we analysed the impact of governance shifts against four selected democratic principles. We found that new modes of governance can make decision-making processes look better than they actually are, and may even harm democratic principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-628
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume57
Issue number4
Early online date26 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

political decision making
reintroduction
Animals
animal
Decision making
decision making
governance
democracy
decision-making process
interview
effect
Rodentia

Keywords

  • charismatic animals
  • decision making
  • democracy
  • governance
  • reintroduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{370fff35cf414b03b6bf99e7684b9e6c,
title = "Political decision making, governance shifts and Scottish animal reintroductions: are democratic principles at stake?",
abstract = "Contemporary governance systems have been characterised as 'multi-actor' and 'multi-level', but the consequences of such greater complexity for core principles of democracy remain uncertain. To investigate the effects of these late-modern governance shifts, we used political decision making on Scottish reintroductions of charismatic animals as a case study. Based on interviews with key actors engaged in the reintroduction of the white-tailed eagle, beaver and (potentially) lynx, we analysed the impact of governance shifts against four selected democratic principles. We found that new modes of governance can make decision-making processes look better than they actually are, and may even harm democratic principles.",
keywords = "charismatic animals, decision making, democracy, governance, reintroduction",
author = "Koen Arts and Anke Fischer and {van der Wal}, Ren{\'e}",
note = "Acknowledgements The authors are very grateful to the interviewees for their co-operation and input. We thank Bill Slee and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper, and acknowledge funding by the University of Aberdeen, the Macaulay Development Trust and the Scottish Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate Programme 3.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09640568.2012.758627",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "612--628",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management",
issn = "0964-0568",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political decision making, governance shifts and Scottish animal reintroductions

T2 - are democratic principles at stake?

AU - Arts, Koen

AU - Fischer, Anke

AU - van der Wal, René

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors are very grateful to the interviewees for their co-operation and input. We thank Bill Slee and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper, and acknowledge funding by the University of Aberdeen, the Macaulay Development Trust and the Scottish Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate Programme 3.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Contemporary governance systems have been characterised as 'multi-actor' and 'multi-level', but the consequences of such greater complexity for core principles of democracy remain uncertain. To investigate the effects of these late-modern governance shifts, we used political decision making on Scottish reintroductions of charismatic animals as a case study. Based on interviews with key actors engaged in the reintroduction of the white-tailed eagle, beaver and (potentially) lynx, we analysed the impact of governance shifts against four selected democratic principles. We found that new modes of governance can make decision-making processes look better than they actually are, and may even harm democratic principles.

AB - Contemporary governance systems have been characterised as 'multi-actor' and 'multi-level', but the consequences of such greater complexity for core principles of democracy remain uncertain. To investigate the effects of these late-modern governance shifts, we used political decision making on Scottish reintroductions of charismatic animals as a case study. Based on interviews with key actors engaged in the reintroduction of the white-tailed eagle, beaver and (potentially) lynx, we analysed the impact of governance shifts against four selected democratic principles. We found that new modes of governance can make decision-making processes look better than they actually are, and may even harm democratic principles.

KW - charismatic animals

KW - decision making

KW - democracy

KW - governance

KW - reintroduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893359308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2012.758627

DO - 10.1080/09640568.2012.758627

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 612

EP - 628

JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

SN - 0964-0568

IS - 4

ER -