PRIME - PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice

A E Walker, J Grimshaw, M Johnston, N Pitts, N Steen, M Eccles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Biomedical research constantly produces new findings but these are not routinely translated into health care practice. One way to address this problem is to develop effective interventions to translate research findings into practice. Currently a range of empirical interventions are available and systematic reviews of these have demonstrated that there is no single best intervention. This evidence base is difficult to use in routine settings because it cannot identify which intervention is most likely to be effective ( or cost effective) in a particular situation. We need to establish a scientific rationale for interventions. As clinical practice is a form of human behaviour, theories of human behaviour that have proved useful in other similar settings may provide a basis for developing a scientific rationale for the choice of interventions to translate research findings into clinical practice.

The objectives of the study are: to amplify and populate scientifically validated theories of behaviour with evidence from the experience of health professionals; to use this as a basis for developing predictive questionnaires using replicable methods; to identify which elements of the questionnaire (i.e., which theoretical constructs) predict clinical practice and distinguish between evidence compliant and non-compliant practice; and on the basis of these results, to identify variables ( based on theoretical constructs) that might be prime targets for behaviour change interventions.

Methods: We will develop postal questionnaires measuring two motivational, three action and one stage theory to explore five behaviours with 800 general medical and 600 general dental practitioners. We will collect data on performance for each of the behaviours. The relationships between predictor variables ( theoretical constructs) and outcome measures ( data on performance) in each survey will be assessed using multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. In the final phase of the project, the findings from all surveys will be analysed simultaneously adopting a random effects approach to investigate whether the relationships between predictor variables and outcome measures are modified by behaviour, professional group or geographical location.

Original languageEnglish
Article number22
Number of pages12
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
General Practitioners
Biomedical Research
Tooth
Regression Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • acute myocardial-infarction
  • precaution adoption process
  • dental-caries experience
  • planned behavior
  • British-association
  • community-dentistry
  • smoking cessation
  • health behavior
  • United-Kingdom
  • self-efficacy

Cite this

PRIME - PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research : selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice. / Walker, A E; Grimshaw, J ; Johnston, M; Pitts, N ; Steen, N ; Eccles, M .

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 22, 19.12.2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64800b4e7304446ab4cab4f27971d6d3,
title = "PRIME - PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice",
abstract = "Background: Biomedical research constantly produces new findings but these are not routinely translated into health care practice. One way to address this problem is to develop effective interventions to translate research findings into practice. Currently a range of empirical interventions are available and systematic reviews of these have demonstrated that there is no single best intervention. This evidence base is difficult to use in routine settings because it cannot identify which intervention is most likely to be effective ( or cost effective) in a particular situation. We need to establish a scientific rationale for interventions. As clinical practice is a form of human behaviour, theories of human behaviour that have proved useful in other similar settings may provide a basis for developing a scientific rationale for the choice of interventions to translate research findings into clinical practice.The objectives of the study are: to amplify and populate scientifically validated theories of behaviour with evidence from the experience of health professionals; to use this as a basis for developing predictive questionnaires using replicable methods; to identify which elements of the questionnaire (i.e., which theoretical constructs) predict clinical practice and distinguish between evidence compliant and non-compliant practice; and on the basis of these results, to identify variables ( based on theoretical constructs) that might be prime targets for behaviour change interventions.Methods: We will develop postal questionnaires measuring two motivational, three action and one stage theory to explore five behaviours with 800 general medical and 600 general dental practitioners. We will collect data on performance for each of the behaviours. The relationships between predictor variables ( theoretical constructs) and outcome measures ( data on performance) in each survey will be assessed using multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. In the final phase of the project, the findings from all surveys will be analysed simultaneously adopting a random effects approach to investigate whether the relationships between predictor variables and outcome measures are modified by behaviour, professional group or geographical location.",
keywords = "acute myocardial-infarction, precaution adoption process, dental-caries experience, planned behavior, British-association, community-dentistry, smoking cessation, health behavior, United-Kingdom, self-efficacy",
author = "Walker, {A E} and J Grimshaw and M Johnston and N Pitts and N Steen and M Eccles",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-3-22",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PRIME - PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research

T2 - selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice

AU - Walker, A E

AU - Grimshaw, J

AU - Johnston, M

AU - Pitts, N

AU - Steen, N

AU - Eccles, M

PY - 2003/12/19

Y1 - 2003/12/19

N2 - Background: Biomedical research constantly produces new findings but these are not routinely translated into health care practice. One way to address this problem is to develop effective interventions to translate research findings into practice. Currently a range of empirical interventions are available and systematic reviews of these have demonstrated that there is no single best intervention. This evidence base is difficult to use in routine settings because it cannot identify which intervention is most likely to be effective ( or cost effective) in a particular situation. We need to establish a scientific rationale for interventions. As clinical practice is a form of human behaviour, theories of human behaviour that have proved useful in other similar settings may provide a basis for developing a scientific rationale for the choice of interventions to translate research findings into clinical practice.The objectives of the study are: to amplify and populate scientifically validated theories of behaviour with evidence from the experience of health professionals; to use this as a basis for developing predictive questionnaires using replicable methods; to identify which elements of the questionnaire (i.e., which theoretical constructs) predict clinical practice and distinguish between evidence compliant and non-compliant practice; and on the basis of these results, to identify variables ( based on theoretical constructs) that might be prime targets for behaviour change interventions.Methods: We will develop postal questionnaires measuring two motivational, three action and one stage theory to explore five behaviours with 800 general medical and 600 general dental practitioners. We will collect data on performance for each of the behaviours. The relationships between predictor variables ( theoretical constructs) and outcome measures ( data on performance) in each survey will be assessed using multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. In the final phase of the project, the findings from all surveys will be analysed simultaneously adopting a random effects approach to investigate whether the relationships between predictor variables and outcome measures are modified by behaviour, professional group or geographical location.

AB - Background: Biomedical research constantly produces new findings but these are not routinely translated into health care practice. One way to address this problem is to develop effective interventions to translate research findings into practice. Currently a range of empirical interventions are available and systematic reviews of these have demonstrated that there is no single best intervention. This evidence base is difficult to use in routine settings because it cannot identify which intervention is most likely to be effective ( or cost effective) in a particular situation. We need to establish a scientific rationale for interventions. As clinical practice is a form of human behaviour, theories of human behaviour that have proved useful in other similar settings may provide a basis for developing a scientific rationale for the choice of interventions to translate research findings into clinical practice.The objectives of the study are: to amplify and populate scientifically validated theories of behaviour with evidence from the experience of health professionals; to use this as a basis for developing predictive questionnaires using replicable methods; to identify which elements of the questionnaire (i.e., which theoretical constructs) predict clinical practice and distinguish between evidence compliant and non-compliant practice; and on the basis of these results, to identify variables ( based on theoretical constructs) that might be prime targets for behaviour change interventions.Methods: We will develop postal questionnaires measuring two motivational, three action and one stage theory to explore five behaviours with 800 general medical and 600 general dental practitioners. We will collect data on performance for each of the behaviours. The relationships between predictor variables ( theoretical constructs) and outcome measures ( data on performance) in each survey will be assessed using multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. In the final phase of the project, the findings from all surveys will be analysed simultaneously adopting a random effects approach to investigate whether the relationships between predictor variables and outcome measures are modified by behaviour, professional group or geographical location.

KW - acute myocardial-infarction

KW - precaution adoption process

KW - dental-caries experience

KW - planned behavior

KW - British-association

KW - community-dentistry

KW - smoking cessation

KW - health behavior

KW - United-Kingdom

KW - self-efficacy

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-3-22

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-3-22

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 22

ER -