Production of Referring Expressions

Preference Trumps Discrimination

Albert Gatt, Emiel Krahmer, Roger P. G. van Gompel, Kees van Deemter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When referring to an object using a description, speakers need to select properties which jointly distinguish it from any potential distractors. Previous empirical and computational work addressing this content selection process has highlighted the role of both (i) the discriminatory power of properties of a referent, i.e. how many of the distractors in a domain each property excludes; (ii) how inherently salient or preferred a property is. To date, there has been no attempt to systematically investigate the trade-o between these two potentially competing motivations. This paper investigates experimentally the extent to which speakers take discriminatory power versus preference into account during content selection for reference production. Our results suggest that discriminatory power in fact plays a relatively unimportant role. We discuss the implications of this for computational models of reference production.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
EditorsMarkus Knauff, Natalie Sebanz, Michael Pauen, Ipke Wachsmuth
Place of PublicationAustin, TX
Pages483-488
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Discrimination
Computational model
Selection process

Cite this

Gatt, A., Krahmer, E., van Gompel, R. P. G., & van Deemter, K. (2013). Production of Referring Expressions: Preference Trumps Discrimination. In M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, M. Pauen, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 483-488). Austin, TX.

Production of Referring Expressions : Preference Trumps Discrimination. / Gatt, Albert; Krahmer, Emiel; van Gompel, Roger P. G.; van Deemter, Kees.

Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. ed. / Markus Knauff; Natalie Sebanz; Michael Pauen; Ipke Wachsmuth. Austin, TX, 2013. p. 483-488.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Gatt, A, Krahmer, E, van Gompel, RPG & van Deemter, K 2013, Production of Referring Expressions: Preference Trumps Discrimination. in M Knauff, N Sebanz, M Pauen & I Wachsmuth (eds), Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX, pp. 483-488.
Gatt A, Krahmer E, van Gompel RPG, van Deemter K. Production of Referring Expressions: Preference Trumps Discrimination. In Knauff M, Sebanz N, Pauen M, Wachsmuth I, editors, Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX. 2013. p. 483-488
Gatt, Albert ; Krahmer, Emiel ; van Gompel, Roger P. G. ; van Deemter, Kees. / Production of Referring Expressions : Preference Trumps Discrimination. Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. editor / Markus Knauff ; Natalie Sebanz ; Michael Pauen ; Ipke Wachsmuth. Austin, TX, 2013. pp. 483-488
@inproceedings{34fecc2edd02421dbfe287cc54266b46,
title = "Production of Referring Expressions: Preference Trumps Discrimination",
abstract = "When referring to an object using a description, speakers need to select properties which jointly distinguish it from any potential distractors. Previous empirical and computational work addressing this content selection process has highlighted the role of both (i) the discriminatory power of properties of a referent, i.e. how many of the distractors in a domain each property excludes; (ii) how inherently salient or preferred a property is. To date, there has been no attempt to systematically investigate the trade-o between these two potentially competing motivations. This paper investigates experimentally the extent to which speakers take discriminatory power versus preference into account during content selection for reference production. Our results suggest that discriminatory power in fact plays a relatively unimportant role. We discuss the implications of this for computational models of reference production.",
author = "Albert Gatt and Emiel Krahmer and {van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.} and {van Deemter}, Kees",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780976831891",
pages = "483--488",
editor = "Markus Knauff and Natalie Sebanz and Michael Pauen and Ipke Wachsmuth",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Production of Referring Expressions

T2 - Preference Trumps Discrimination

AU - Gatt, Albert

AU - Krahmer, Emiel

AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

AU - van Deemter, Kees

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - When referring to an object using a description, speakers need to select properties which jointly distinguish it from any potential distractors. Previous empirical and computational work addressing this content selection process has highlighted the role of both (i) the discriminatory power of properties of a referent, i.e. how many of the distractors in a domain each property excludes; (ii) how inherently salient or preferred a property is. To date, there has been no attempt to systematically investigate the trade-o between these two potentially competing motivations. This paper investigates experimentally the extent to which speakers take discriminatory power versus preference into account during content selection for reference production. Our results suggest that discriminatory power in fact plays a relatively unimportant role. We discuss the implications of this for computational models of reference production.

AB - When referring to an object using a description, speakers need to select properties which jointly distinguish it from any potential distractors. Previous empirical and computational work addressing this content selection process has highlighted the role of both (i) the discriminatory power of properties of a referent, i.e. how many of the distractors in a domain each property excludes; (ii) how inherently salient or preferred a property is. To date, there has been no attempt to systematically investigate the trade-o between these two potentially competing motivations. This paper investigates experimentally the extent to which speakers take discriminatory power versus preference into account during content selection for reference production. Our results suggest that discriminatory power in fact plays a relatively unimportant role. We discuss the implications of this for computational models of reference production.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780976831891

SP - 483

EP - 488

BT - Proceedings of the 35th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society

A2 - Knauff, Markus

A2 - Sebanz, Natalie

A2 - Pauen, Michael

A2 - Wachsmuth, Ipke

CY - Austin, TX

ER -