Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks: examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon

Z. L. Frogbrook, J. Bell, R. I. Bradley, C. Evans, R. M. Lark, B. Reynolds, P. Smith, W. Towers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intensive field surveys were undertaken in two upland catchments in the UK, Plynlimon in mid-Wales and Glensaugh in North East Scotland. The survey was to examine the spatial variation across the area and to assess the accuracy of the database underpinning the soil carbon map for the UK. In each area three 1-km(2) squares were sampled on a 200-m grid, with samples taken from both the organic and mineral horizons. Carbon stock was estimated, from the sample data, for each 1-km(2) square and compared with values from the UK database for that square. The results showed large differences between some squares, particularly for Plynlimon. In this area, the overall discrepancy between field and database values was 45%, compared with 8% for Glensaugh. Various sources of uncertainty were examined, including bulk density, organic horizon depth, and the proportion of different soil types within a square. The value for bulk density, assumed to determine carbon stock, had a significant effect on the estimates. In both catchments the organic layer showed a gradual decrease in bulk density with depth, resulting in a large proportion of the carbon being stored in the top part of the profile. The soil types, mapped during the survey, also showed large differences from those previously identified for each 1-km(2) square. This would have a considerable effect on the estimates of carbon stock within the UK database. It highlights that caution needs to be used when interpreting the UK soil map at this spatial scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-332
Number of pages13
JournalSoil Use & Management
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date10 Aug 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Keywords

  • soil carbon
  • bulk density
  • soil type
  • organic horizon
  • carbon stocks
  • spatial variation
  • organic-carbon
  • Great-Britain
  • New-Zealand
  • temperature
  • decomposition
  • sensitivity
  • losses

Cite this

Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks : examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon. / Frogbrook, Z. L.; Bell, J.; Bradley, R. I.; Evans, C.; Lark, R. M.; Reynolds, B.; Smith, P.; Towers, W.

In: Soil Use & Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 320-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frogbrook, Z. L. ; Bell, J. ; Bradley, R. I. ; Evans, C. ; Lark, R. M. ; Reynolds, B. ; Smith, P. ; Towers, W. / Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks : examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon. In: Soil Use & Management. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 320-332.
@article{02fb2cd8fe044c298a5764bda6c8d733,
title = "Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks: examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon",
abstract = "Intensive field surveys were undertaken in two upland catchments in the UK, Plynlimon in mid-Wales and Glensaugh in North East Scotland. The survey was to examine the spatial variation across the area and to assess the accuracy of the database underpinning the soil carbon map for the UK. In each area three 1-km(2) squares were sampled on a 200-m grid, with samples taken from both the organic and mineral horizons. Carbon stock was estimated, from the sample data, for each 1-km(2) square and compared with values from the UK database for that square. The results showed large differences between some squares, particularly for Plynlimon. In this area, the overall discrepancy between field and database values was 45{\%}, compared with 8{\%} for Glensaugh. Various sources of uncertainty were examined, including bulk density, organic horizon depth, and the proportion of different soil types within a square. The value for bulk density, assumed to determine carbon stock, had a significant effect on the estimates. In both catchments the organic layer showed a gradual decrease in bulk density with depth, resulting in a large proportion of the carbon being stored in the top part of the profile. The soil types, mapped during the survey, also showed large differences from those previously identified for each 1-km(2) square. This would have a considerable effect on the estimates of carbon stock within the UK database. It highlights that caution needs to be used when interpreting the UK soil map at this spatial scale.",
keywords = "soil carbon, bulk density, soil type, organic horizon, carbon stocks, spatial variation, organic-carbon, Great-Britain, New-Zealand, temperature, decomposition, sensitivity, losses",
author = "Frogbrook, {Z. L.} and J. Bell and Bradley, {R. I.} and C. Evans and Lark, {R. M.} and B. Reynolds and P. Smith and W. Towers",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00232.x",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "320--332",
journal = "Soil Use & Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying terrestrial carbon stocks

T2 - examining the spatial variation in two upland areas in the UK and a comparison to mapped estimates of soil carbon

AU - Frogbrook, Z. L.

AU - Bell, J.

AU - Bradley, R. I.

AU - Evans, C.

AU - Lark, R. M.

AU - Reynolds, B.

AU - Smith, P.

AU - Towers, W.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Intensive field surveys were undertaken in two upland catchments in the UK, Plynlimon in mid-Wales and Glensaugh in North East Scotland. The survey was to examine the spatial variation across the area and to assess the accuracy of the database underpinning the soil carbon map for the UK. In each area three 1-km(2) squares were sampled on a 200-m grid, with samples taken from both the organic and mineral horizons. Carbon stock was estimated, from the sample data, for each 1-km(2) square and compared with values from the UK database for that square. The results showed large differences between some squares, particularly for Plynlimon. In this area, the overall discrepancy between field and database values was 45%, compared with 8% for Glensaugh. Various sources of uncertainty were examined, including bulk density, organic horizon depth, and the proportion of different soil types within a square. The value for bulk density, assumed to determine carbon stock, had a significant effect on the estimates. In both catchments the organic layer showed a gradual decrease in bulk density with depth, resulting in a large proportion of the carbon being stored in the top part of the profile. The soil types, mapped during the survey, also showed large differences from those previously identified for each 1-km(2) square. This would have a considerable effect on the estimates of carbon stock within the UK database. It highlights that caution needs to be used when interpreting the UK soil map at this spatial scale.

AB - Intensive field surveys were undertaken in two upland catchments in the UK, Plynlimon in mid-Wales and Glensaugh in North East Scotland. The survey was to examine the spatial variation across the area and to assess the accuracy of the database underpinning the soil carbon map for the UK. In each area three 1-km(2) squares were sampled on a 200-m grid, with samples taken from both the organic and mineral horizons. Carbon stock was estimated, from the sample data, for each 1-km(2) square and compared with values from the UK database for that square. The results showed large differences between some squares, particularly for Plynlimon. In this area, the overall discrepancy between field and database values was 45%, compared with 8% for Glensaugh. Various sources of uncertainty were examined, including bulk density, organic horizon depth, and the proportion of different soil types within a square. The value for bulk density, assumed to determine carbon stock, had a significant effect on the estimates. In both catchments the organic layer showed a gradual decrease in bulk density with depth, resulting in a large proportion of the carbon being stored in the top part of the profile. The soil types, mapped during the survey, also showed large differences from those previously identified for each 1-km(2) square. This would have a considerable effect on the estimates of carbon stock within the UK database. It highlights that caution needs to be used when interpreting the UK soil map at this spatial scale.

KW - soil carbon

KW - bulk density

KW - soil type

KW - organic horizon

KW - carbon stocks

KW - spatial variation

KW - organic-carbon

KW - Great-Britain

KW - New-Zealand

KW - temperature

KW - decomposition

KW - sensitivity

KW - losses

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00232.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00232.x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 320

EP - 332

JO - Soil Use & Management

JF - Soil Use & Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - 3

ER -