Quantifying the effect of boat disturbance on bottlenose dolphin foraging activity

Enrico Pirotta*, Nathan D. Merchant, Paul M. Thompson, Tim R. Barton, David Lusseau

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessments of anthropogenic impacts on marine wildlife often concentrate on large-scale displacement. However, changes in the activity patterns of animals that do not flee could also affect their energy balance. Increasing boat traffic raises concerns for exposed marine mammals. Understanding risk perception is critical for effective mitigation and management, but it is hard to disentangle the effect of noise, physical presence of boats, and context. We used passive acoustic techniques to quantify how boat disturbance affected bottlenose dolphin foraging activity, and characterized the conditions influencing responses. To account for potential masking effects of boat noise on foraging vocalizations (buzzes), we developed a novel procedure to estimate the relationship between buzz detection probability and noise levels in particular 1/3 octave bands. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was then used to assess the effect of boat presence on buzz occurrence, as well as potential interactions with noise level, location, year, day, hour, dolphin group size, and boat type and number. Our results indicate that boat presence was associated with a short-term 49% reduction in foraging activity, but there was no relationship with noise level. Differences between sites and between years suggested a variable susceptibility depending on foraging conditions. This effect increased for increasing number of boats and depended on boat type. This is the first study conclusively showing that boat physical presence, and not just noise, plays a large role in disturbance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-89
Number of pages8
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume181
Early online date28 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Tursiops truncatus
boats
dolphin
foraging
disturbance
acoustic method
risk perception
vocalization
marine mammal
activity pattern
group size
energy balance
mitigation
effect
animal
modeling
noise level
marine mammals
dolphins
traffic

Keywords

  • Bayesian hierarchical model
  • Behavioral response
  • Feeding buzz
  • Noise masking
  • Passive acoustic data
  • Vessel traffic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Quantifying the effect of boat disturbance on bottlenose dolphin foraging activity. / Pirotta, Enrico; Merchant, Nathan D.; Thompson, Paul M.; Barton, Tim R.; Lusseau, David.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 181, 01.2015, p. 82-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{822ba2b9777f45749f833d14240d4a9d,
title = "Quantifying the effect of boat disturbance on bottlenose dolphin foraging activity",
abstract = "Assessments of anthropogenic impacts on marine wildlife often concentrate on large-scale displacement. However, changes in the activity patterns of animals that do not flee could also affect their energy balance. Increasing boat traffic raises concerns for exposed marine mammals. Understanding risk perception is critical for effective mitigation and management, but it is hard to disentangle the effect of noise, physical presence of boats, and context. We used passive acoustic techniques to quantify how boat disturbance affected bottlenose dolphin foraging activity, and characterized the conditions influencing responses. To account for potential masking effects of boat noise on foraging vocalizations (buzzes), we developed a novel procedure to estimate the relationship between buzz detection probability and noise levels in particular 1/3 octave bands. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was then used to assess the effect of boat presence on buzz occurrence, as well as potential interactions with noise level, location, year, day, hour, dolphin group size, and boat type and number. Our results indicate that boat presence was associated with a short-term 49{\%} reduction in foraging activity, but there was no relationship with noise level. Differences between sites and between years suggested a variable susceptibility depending on foraging conditions. This effect increased for increasing number of boats and depended on boat type. This is the first study conclusively showing that boat physical presence, and not just noise, plays a large role in disturbance.",
keywords = "Bayesian hierarchical model, Behavioral response, Feeding buzz, Noise masking, Passive acoustic data, Vessel traffic",
author = "Enrico Pirotta and Merchant, {Nathan D.} and Thompson, {Paul M.} and Barton, {Tim R.} and David Lusseau",
note = "Acknowledgements This work received funding from the MASTS pooling initiative and their support is gratefully acknowledged (Scottish Funding Council, grant reference HR09011, and contributing institutions). We thank Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd., Beatrice Offshore Wind Ltd. and DECC for access to equipment and acoustic data collected for parallel studies in this area. We also thank Moray First Marine, Barbara Cheney, Rebecca Hewitt, Rachel Plunkett, Tessa Van Heumen and Ewan Edwards for helping deploy and recover devices, and Laura Ceyrac and James Robbins for collecting visual data. Finally, we thank John Harwood, Doug Gillespie, Gordon Hastie, Len Thomas, Kate Brookes, Marianne Marcoux, Luke Rendell, Thomas Cornulier, Olivia Harries and Anja Wittich for advice on study design and analysis. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "181",
pages = "82--89",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the effect of boat disturbance on bottlenose dolphin foraging activity

AU - Pirotta, Enrico

AU - Merchant, Nathan D.

AU - Thompson, Paul M.

AU - Barton, Tim R.

AU - Lusseau, David

N1 - Acknowledgements This work received funding from the MASTS pooling initiative and their support is gratefully acknowledged (Scottish Funding Council, grant reference HR09011, and contributing institutions). We thank Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd., Beatrice Offshore Wind Ltd. and DECC for access to equipment and acoustic data collected for parallel studies in this area. We also thank Moray First Marine, Barbara Cheney, Rebecca Hewitt, Rachel Plunkett, Tessa Van Heumen and Ewan Edwards for helping deploy and recover devices, and Laura Ceyrac and James Robbins for collecting visual data. Finally, we thank John Harwood, Doug Gillespie, Gordon Hastie, Len Thomas, Kate Brookes, Marianne Marcoux, Luke Rendell, Thomas Cornulier, Olivia Harries and Anja Wittich for advice on study design and analysis. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Assessments of anthropogenic impacts on marine wildlife often concentrate on large-scale displacement. However, changes in the activity patterns of animals that do not flee could also affect their energy balance. Increasing boat traffic raises concerns for exposed marine mammals. Understanding risk perception is critical for effective mitigation and management, but it is hard to disentangle the effect of noise, physical presence of boats, and context. We used passive acoustic techniques to quantify how boat disturbance affected bottlenose dolphin foraging activity, and characterized the conditions influencing responses. To account for potential masking effects of boat noise on foraging vocalizations (buzzes), we developed a novel procedure to estimate the relationship between buzz detection probability and noise levels in particular 1/3 octave bands. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was then used to assess the effect of boat presence on buzz occurrence, as well as potential interactions with noise level, location, year, day, hour, dolphin group size, and boat type and number. Our results indicate that boat presence was associated with a short-term 49% reduction in foraging activity, but there was no relationship with noise level. Differences between sites and between years suggested a variable susceptibility depending on foraging conditions. This effect increased for increasing number of boats and depended on boat type. This is the first study conclusively showing that boat physical presence, and not just noise, plays a large role in disturbance.

AB - Assessments of anthropogenic impacts on marine wildlife often concentrate on large-scale displacement. However, changes in the activity patterns of animals that do not flee could also affect their energy balance. Increasing boat traffic raises concerns for exposed marine mammals. Understanding risk perception is critical for effective mitigation and management, but it is hard to disentangle the effect of noise, physical presence of boats, and context. We used passive acoustic techniques to quantify how boat disturbance affected bottlenose dolphin foraging activity, and characterized the conditions influencing responses. To account for potential masking effects of boat noise on foraging vocalizations (buzzes), we developed a novel procedure to estimate the relationship between buzz detection probability and noise levels in particular 1/3 octave bands. Bayesian hierarchical modeling was then used to assess the effect of boat presence on buzz occurrence, as well as potential interactions with noise level, location, year, day, hour, dolphin group size, and boat type and number. Our results indicate that boat presence was associated with a short-term 49% reduction in foraging activity, but there was no relationship with noise level. Differences between sites and between years suggested a variable susceptibility depending on foraging conditions. This effect increased for increasing number of boats and depended on boat type. This is the first study conclusively showing that boat physical presence, and not just noise, plays a large role in disturbance.

KW - Bayesian hierarchical model

KW - Behavioral response

KW - Feeding buzz

KW - Noise masking

KW - Passive acoustic data

KW - Vessel traffic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913535789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 181

SP - 82

EP - 89

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -