TY - GEN
T1 - Re-evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
AU - Younes, Maged
AU - Aquilina, Gabriele
AU - Castle, Laurence
AU - Engel, Karl-Heinz
AU - Fowler, Paul
AU - Fürst, Peter
AU - Gürtler, Rainer
AU - Gundert-Remy, Ursula
AU - Husøy, Trine
AU - Manco, Melania
AU - Mennes, Wim
AU - Moldeus, Peter
AU - Passamonti, Sabina
AU - Shah, Romina
AU - Waalkens-Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
AU - Wölfle, Detlef
AU - Wright, Matthew
AU - Boon, Polly
AU - Crebelli, Riccardo
AU - Di Domenico, Alessandro
AU - Filipič, Metka
AU - Mortensen, Alicja
AU - Woutersen, Ruud
AU - Van Loveren, Henk
AU - Giarola, Alessandra
AU - Lodi, Federica
AU - Rincon, Ana Maria
AU - Tard, Alexandra
AU - Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
AU - EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
N1 - Acknowledgements: The Panel wishes to thank Brian Flynn for the support provided to this scientific output. The FAF Panel wishes to acknowledge all European competent institutions, Member State bodies and other organisations that provided data for this scientific output.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, PVP) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, PVPP) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of PVP (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel followed the conceptual framework under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 and considered that: the exposure assessment was based on the reported use and use levels (one food category out of the two food categories in which PVP and PVPP are authorised); the 95th percentile of exposure to PVP and PVPP of maximally 23.7 and 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in children, respectively, was overestimated, because it was assumed that 100 the extension of use of PVP (E 1201) to foods for special medical purposes (FC 13.2) would result in an exposure of PVP of 4.3 mg/kg bw per day for children; the absorption of PVP and PVPP is very low; sufficient toxicity data were available for PVP; there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of PVP and PVPP; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in rats at a dose of 2,500 mg PVP/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested; there is no need for chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity data for PVPP for the safety assessment of PVPP given the chemical similarity between PVP and PVPP, and the lack of adverse effects in the available repeated dose toxicity studies. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for PVP and PVPP, and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of PVP and PVPP as food additives. The Panel further concluded that the proposed extension of use is not expected to be of safety concern at the proposed maximum permitted level (MPL) and recommended consumption level.
AB - The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, PVP) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, PVPP) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of PVP (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel followed the conceptual framework under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 and considered that: the exposure assessment was based on the reported use and use levels (one food category out of the two food categories in which PVP and PVPP are authorised); the 95th percentile of exposure to PVP and PVPP of maximally 23.7 and 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in children, respectively, was overestimated, because it was assumed that 100 the extension of use of PVP (E 1201) to foods for special medical purposes (FC 13.2) would result in an exposure of PVP of 4.3 mg/kg bw per day for children; the absorption of PVP and PVPP is very low; sufficient toxicity data were available for PVP; there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of PVP and PVPP; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in rats at a dose of 2,500 mg PVP/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested; there is no need for chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity data for PVPP for the safety assessment of PVPP given the chemical similarity between PVP and PVPP, and the lack of adverse effects in the available repeated dose toxicity studies. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for PVP and PVPP, and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of PVP and PVPP as food additives. The Panel further concluded that the proposed extension of use is not expected to be of safety concern at the proposed maximum permitted level (MPL) and recommended consumption level.
KW - polyvinylpyrrolidone
KW - E 1201
KW - polyvinylpolypyrrolidone
KW - E 1202
KW - food additives
KW - foods for special medical purposes
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6215
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6215
M3 - Article
C2 - 32788942
VL - 18
SP - e06215
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
SN - 1831-4732
ER -