Recognising and translating knowledge: navigating the political, epistemological, legal and ontological

James Leach, Richard Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What does it mean to call something ‘knowledge’ today? What does this recognition or translation require? And what does it entrain? This introduction makes a novel synthesis of contributions to the Special Issue and advances original observations regarding the ‘mythic’ qualities of Intellectual Property Law, the precipitation of ‘nature’, and the importance of attending to what is lost when things and practices are also ‘knowledge’. The papers cohere around a remarkable and timely set of observations and critiques: critiques of the way the knowledge economy makes demands and defines expectations about value; of how intellectual property law lies behind and shapes exclusions, inclusions and inequalities; of the ‘mythic’ status of assumptions informing laws about ownership; and the implicit hierarchy contained within types of knowledge as understood through the categories of western science. By taking up effect rather than veracity and certainty, the contributors are drawn into the very contestations that surround ‘knowledge’ without removing the work of definition from those making claims or feeling the effects of something appearing as ‘knowledge’. A common observation is to notice how equivalences across practices, made for the purpose of creating the possibility of exchange value (and thus of encouraging circulation) does its work at the expense of multiple aspects, values, and relations that are also discernable in social processes that produce ‘knowledge’. Contributors leave the definition of knowledge to ethnographic subjects. That is, they attend to where and how things come to be called knowledge, and for what reasons.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-223
Number of pages15
JournalAnthropological Forum
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

intellectual property
Law
knowledge economy
equivalence
social process
Values
exclusion
inclusion
science
Ontological
Translating
Epistemological
Property Law
Intellectual Property
Equivalence
Ownership
Inclusion-exclusion
Social Processes
Appearings
Ethnographic

Cite this

Recognising and translating knowledge : navigating the political, epistemological, legal and ontological. / Leach, James; Davis, Richard.

In: Anthropological Forum, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2012, p. 209-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7968680d27a141a9b4dd7738742d3f38,
title = "Recognising and translating knowledge: navigating the political, epistemological, legal and ontological",
abstract = "What does it mean to call something ‘knowledge’ today? What does this recognition or translation require? And what does it entrain? This introduction makes a novel synthesis of contributions to the Special Issue and advances original observations regarding the ‘mythic’ qualities of Intellectual Property Law, the precipitation of ‘nature’, and the importance of attending to what is lost when things and practices are also ‘knowledge’. The papers cohere around a remarkable and timely set of observations and critiques: critiques of the way the knowledge economy makes demands and defines expectations about value; of how intellectual property law lies behind and shapes exclusions, inclusions and inequalities; of the ‘mythic’ status of assumptions informing laws about ownership; and the implicit hierarchy contained within types of knowledge as understood through the categories of western science. By taking up effect rather than veracity and certainty, the contributors are drawn into the very contestations that surround ‘knowledge’ without removing the work of definition from those making claims or feeling the effects of something appearing as ‘knowledge’. A common observation is to notice how equivalences across practices, made for the purpose of creating the possibility of exchange value (and thus of encouraging circulation) does its work at the expense of multiple aspects, values, and relations that are also discernable in social processes that produce ‘knowledge’. Contributors leave the definition of knowledge to ethnographic subjects. That is, they attend to where and how things come to be called knowledge, and for what reasons.",
author = "James Leach and Richard Davis",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/00664677.2012.724007",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "209--223",
journal = "Anthropological Forum",
issn = "0066-4677",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognising and translating knowledge

T2 - navigating the political, epistemological, legal and ontological

AU - Leach, James

AU - Davis, Richard

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - What does it mean to call something ‘knowledge’ today? What does this recognition or translation require? And what does it entrain? This introduction makes a novel synthesis of contributions to the Special Issue and advances original observations regarding the ‘mythic’ qualities of Intellectual Property Law, the precipitation of ‘nature’, and the importance of attending to what is lost when things and practices are also ‘knowledge’. The papers cohere around a remarkable and timely set of observations and critiques: critiques of the way the knowledge economy makes demands and defines expectations about value; of how intellectual property law lies behind and shapes exclusions, inclusions and inequalities; of the ‘mythic’ status of assumptions informing laws about ownership; and the implicit hierarchy contained within types of knowledge as understood through the categories of western science. By taking up effect rather than veracity and certainty, the contributors are drawn into the very contestations that surround ‘knowledge’ without removing the work of definition from those making claims or feeling the effects of something appearing as ‘knowledge’. A common observation is to notice how equivalences across practices, made for the purpose of creating the possibility of exchange value (and thus of encouraging circulation) does its work at the expense of multiple aspects, values, and relations that are also discernable in social processes that produce ‘knowledge’. Contributors leave the definition of knowledge to ethnographic subjects. That is, they attend to where and how things come to be called knowledge, and for what reasons.

AB - What does it mean to call something ‘knowledge’ today? What does this recognition or translation require? And what does it entrain? This introduction makes a novel synthesis of contributions to the Special Issue and advances original observations regarding the ‘mythic’ qualities of Intellectual Property Law, the precipitation of ‘nature’, and the importance of attending to what is lost when things and practices are also ‘knowledge’. The papers cohere around a remarkable and timely set of observations and critiques: critiques of the way the knowledge economy makes demands and defines expectations about value; of how intellectual property law lies behind and shapes exclusions, inclusions and inequalities; of the ‘mythic’ status of assumptions informing laws about ownership; and the implicit hierarchy contained within types of knowledge as understood through the categories of western science. By taking up effect rather than veracity and certainty, the contributors are drawn into the very contestations that surround ‘knowledge’ without removing the work of definition from those making claims or feeling the effects of something appearing as ‘knowledge’. A common observation is to notice how equivalences across practices, made for the purpose of creating the possibility of exchange value (and thus of encouraging circulation) does its work at the expense of multiple aspects, values, and relations that are also discernable in social processes that produce ‘knowledge’. Contributors leave the definition of knowledge to ethnographic subjects. That is, they attend to where and how things come to be called knowledge, and for what reasons.

U2 - 10.1080/00664677.2012.724007

DO - 10.1080/00664677.2012.724007

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 209

EP - 223

JO - Anthropological Forum

JF - Anthropological Forum

SN - 0066-4677

IS - 3

ER -