Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf

R. J. Gutiérrez*, Gavin Jones, Steve M. Redpath, Alan B. Franklin, Daniel Simberloff, Monica G. Turner, Volker C. Radeloff, Gary C. White, M. Zachariah Peery

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-557
Number of pages2
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume17
Issue number10
Early online date2 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gutiérrez, R. J., Jones, G., Redpath, S. M., Franklin, A. B., Simberloff, D., Turner, M. G., Radeloff, V. C., White, G. C., & Peery, M. Z. (2019). Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(10), 556-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2131