We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019).
Gutiérrez, R. J., Jones, G., Redpath, S. M., Franklin, A. B., Simberloff, D., Turner, M. G., Radeloff, V. C., White, G. C., & Peery, M. Z. (2019). Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(10), 556-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2131