Response to Adam et al. regarding selection methods

Fiona Patterson, Alec Knight, Jon Dowell, Sandra Nicholson, Fran Cousans, Jennifer Cleland

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

We thank the Editor for the opportunity to respond to Adam et al.'s letter.[1] In our systematic review[2], we state ‘Potentially relevant articles were identified by the search strategy and title screened for relevance (n = 3, 152)’. Our search terms were peer-reviewed. An independent re-run of the search, to check whether we missed the papers in question, confirmed that the two papers authored by Adam et al.[3, 4] do not appear in the results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)670
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Education
Volume51
Issue number6
Early online date27 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Letter

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Adam et al. regarding selection methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Patterson, F., Knight, A., Dowell, J., Nicholson, S., Cousans, F., & Cleland, J. (2017). Response to Adam et al. regarding selection methods. Medical Education, 51(6), 670. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13251