Response to John Hick’s ‘The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion’

Robert Segal

Response to John Hick’s ‘The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion’

Robert Segal

Religious Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	93-99
Journal	Religious Traditions
Volume	18-20
Publication status	Published - 1995

Bibliographical note

Response to John Hick’s ‘The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion’,” Religious Traditions18-20 (1995-97), 93-99

Cite this

@article{d9bbd584affc489680316497f8e5e8e1,

title = "Response to John Hick{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion{\textquoteright}",

author = "Robert Segal",

note = "Response to John Hick{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion{\textquoteright},” Religious Traditions18-20 (1995-97), 93-99 ",

year = "1995",

language = "English",

volume = "18-20",

pages = "93--99",

journal = "Religious Traditions",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to John Hick’s ‘The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion’

AU - Segal, Robert

N1 - Response to John Hick’s ‘The Subjective and Objective Dimensions of the Study of Religion’,” Religious Traditions18-20 (1995-97), 93-99

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

M3 - Article

VL - 18-20

SP - 93

EP - 99

JO - Religious Traditions

JF - Religious Traditions

ER -