Say it to my face

examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation

Fiona Gabbert, Amina Memon, Kevin Allan, Daniel B. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

141 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Errors in eyewitness accounts can occur when a witness comes into contact with post-event 'misinformation'. A common way to encounter misinformation is through face-to-face interaction, in particular, via conversation with other individuals who also witnessed the crime. The current research compares this kind of misinformation with the non-social post-event narrative method typically employed in laboratory studies.

Method. Young (17-33 years) and older (58-80 years) adults viewed a simulated crime event on video and were later exposed to four items of misinformation about it. The misinformation items were either introduced as part of a discussion about the event with a confederate or were embedded within a written narrative about the event that participants were asked to read. A questionnaire containing 20 items about the event was given to participants before and after the experimental manipulation.

Results. Participants were less accurate than controls on questionnaire items after encountering misinformation. More importantly, misinformation encountered socially was significantly more misleading than misinformation from a non-social source. This was true for both young and older adults.

Conclusion. Misinformation encountered socially produced more errors than misinformation from a non-social source. This finding has implications both for applied (forensic) and theoretical understanding of eyewitness memory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-227
Number of pages12
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004

Keywords

  • eyewitness testimony
  • memory impairment
  • conformity
  • suggestibility
  • age

Cite this

Say it to my face : examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. / Gabbert, Fiona; Memon, Amina; Allan, Kevin; Wright, Daniel B. .

In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 09.2004, p. 215-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gabbert, Fiona ; Memon, Amina ; Allan, Kevin ; Wright, Daniel B. . / Say it to my face : examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. In: Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2004 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 215-227.
@article{76c91ed2e98a4daeaee2bf78f44e885a,
title = "Say it to my face: examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation",
abstract = "Objectives. Errors in eyewitness accounts can occur when a witness comes into contact with post-event 'misinformation'. A common way to encounter misinformation is through face-to-face interaction, in particular, via conversation with other individuals who also witnessed the crime. The current research compares this kind of misinformation with the non-social post-event narrative method typically employed in laboratory studies.Method. Young (17-33 years) and older (58-80 years) adults viewed a simulated crime event on video and were later exposed to four items of misinformation about it. The misinformation items were either introduced as part of a discussion about the event with a confederate or were embedded within a written narrative about the event that participants were asked to read. A questionnaire containing 20 items about the event was given to participants before and after the experimental manipulation.Results. Participants were less accurate than controls on questionnaire items after encountering misinformation. More importantly, misinformation encountered socially was significantly more misleading than misinformation from a non-social source. This was true for both young and older adults.Conclusion. Misinformation encountered socially produced more errors than misinformation from a non-social source. This finding has implications both for applied (forensic) and theoretical understanding of eyewitness memory.",
keywords = "eyewitness testimony, memory impairment, conformity, suggestibility, age",
author = "Fiona Gabbert and Amina Memon and Kevin Allan and Wright, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1348/1355325041719428",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "215--227",
journal = "Legal and Criminological Psychology",
issn = "1355-3259",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Say it to my face

T2 - examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

AU - Memon, Amina

AU - Allan, Kevin

AU - Wright, Daniel B.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Objectives. Errors in eyewitness accounts can occur when a witness comes into contact with post-event 'misinformation'. A common way to encounter misinformation is through face-to-face interaction, in particular, via conversation with other individuals who also witnessed the crime. The current research compares this kind of misinformation with the non-social post-event narrative method typically employed in laboratory studies.Method. Young (17-33 years) and older (58-80 years) adults viewed a simulated crime event on video and were later exposed to four items of misinformation about it. The misinformation items were either introduced as part of a discussion about the event with a confederate or were embedded within a written narrative about the event that participants were asked to read. A questionnaire containing 20 items about the event was given to participants before and after the experimental manipulation.Results. Participants were less accurate than controls on questionnaire items after encountering misinformation. More importantly, misinformation encountered socially was significantly more misleading than misinformation from a non-social source. This was true for both young and older adults.Conclusion. Misinformation encountered socially produced more errors than misinformation from a non-social source. This finding has implications both for applied (forensic) and theoretical understanding of eyewitness memory.

AB - Objectives. Errors in eyewitness accounts can occur when a witness comes into contact with post-event 'misinformation'. A common way to encounter misinformation is through face-to-face interaction, in particular, via conversation with other individuals who also witnessed the crime. The current research compares this kind of misinformation with the non-social post-event narrative method typically employed in laboratory studies.Method. Young (17-33 years) and older (58-80 years) adults viewed a simulated crime event on video and were later exposed to four items of misinformation about it. The misinformation items were either introduced as part of a discussion about the event with a confederate or were embedded within a written narrative about the event that participants were asked to read. A questionnaire containing 20 items about the event was given to participants before and after the experimental manipulation.Results. Participants were less accurate than controls on questionnaire items after encountering misinformation. More importantly, misinformation encountered socially was significantly more misleading than misinformation from a non-social source. This was true for both young and older adults.Conclusion. Misinformation encountered socially produced more errors than misinformation from a non-social source. This finding has implications both for applied (forensic) and theoretical understanding of eyewitness memory.

KW - eyewitness testimony

KW - memory impairment

KW - conformity

KW - suggestibility

KW - age

U2 - 10.1348/1355325041719428

DO - 10.1348/1355325041719428

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 215

EP - 227

JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology

JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology

SN - 1355-3259

IS - 2

ER -