Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires

David Brendan Price, David G Tinkelman, Robert J Nordyke, Sharon Isonaka, R J Halbert, COPD Questionnaire Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: In most primary care settings, spirometric screening of all patients at risk is not practical. In prior work, we developed questionnaires to help identify COPD in two risk groups: (1) persons with a positive smoking history but no history of obstructive lung disease (case finding), and (2) patients with prior evidence of obstructive lung disease (differential diagnosis). For these questionnaires, we now present a scoring system for use in primary care.

Methods: Scores for individual questions were based on the regression coefficients from logistic regression models using a spirometry-based diagnosis of obstruction as the reference outcome. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine performance characteristics for each questionnaire. Several simplified scoring systems were developed and tested.

Results: For both scenarios, we created a scoring system with two cut points intended to place subjects within one of three zones: persons with a high likelihood of having obstruction (high predictive value of a positive test result); persons with a low likelihood of obstruction (high predictive value of a negative test result); and an intermediate zone. Using these scoring systems, we achieved sensitivities of 54 to 82%, specificities of 58 to 88%, positive predictive values of 30 to 78%, and negative predictive values of 71 to 93%.

Conclusions: These questionnaires can be used to help identify persons likely to have COPD among specific risk groups. The use of a simplified scoring system makes these tools beneficial in the primary care setting. Used in conjunction with spirometry, these tools can help improve the efficiency and accuracy of COPD diagnosis in primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1531-1539
Number of pages9
JournalChest
Volume129
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Asthma
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Primary Health Care
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
  • Questionnaires
  • ROC Curve
  • Risk Factors
  • Smoking

Cite this

Price, D. B., Tinkelman, D. G., Nordyke, R. J., Isonaka, S., Halbert, R. J., & COPD Questionnaire Study Group (2006). Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires. Chest, 129(6), 1531-1539. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1531

Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires. / Price, David Brendan; Tinkelman, David G; Nordyke, Robert J; Isonaka, Sharon; Halbert, R J; COPD Questionnaire Study Group.

In: Chest, Vol. 129, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 1531-1539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, DB, Tinkelman, DG, Nordyke, RJ, Isonaka, S, Halbert, RJ & COPD Questionnaire Study Group 2006, 'Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires', Chest, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1531-1539. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1531
Price DB, Tinkelman DG, Nordyke RJ, Isonaka S, Halbert RJ, COPD Questionnaire Study Group. Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires. Chest. 2006 Jun 1;129(6):1531-1539. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1531
Price, David Brendan ; Tinkelman, David G ; Nordyke, Robert J ; Isonaka, Sharon ; Halbert, R J ; COPD Questionnaire Study Group. / Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires. In: Chest. 2006 ; Vol. 129, No. 6. pp. 1531-1539.
@article{6f2e45b50e1b40789c2c2afb469eeec9,
title = "Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires",
abstract = "Objectives: In most primary care settings, spirometric screening of all patients at risk is not practical. In prior work, we developed questionnaires to help identify COPD in two risk groups: (1) persons with a positive smoking history but no history of obstructive lung disease (case finding), and (2) patients with prior evidence of obstructive lung disease (differential diagnosis). For these questionnaires, we now present a scoring system for use in primary care.Methods: Scores for individual questions were based on the regression coefficients from logistic regression models using a spirometry-based diagnosis of obstruction as the reference outcome. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine performance characteristics for each questionnaire. Several simplified scoring systems were developed and tested.Results: For both scenarios, we created a scoring system with two cut points intended to place subjects within one of three zones: persons with a high likelihood of having obstruction (high predictive value of a positive test result); persons with a low likelihood of obstruction (high predictive value of a negative test result); and an intermediate zone. Using these scoring systems, we achieved sensitivities of 54 to 82{\%}, specificities of 58 to 88{\%}, positive predictive values of 30 to 78{\%}, and negative predictive values of 71 to 93{\%}.Conclusions: These questionnaires can be used to help identify persons likely to have COPD among specific risk groups. The use of a simplified scoring system makes these tools beneficial in the primary care setting. Used in conjunction with spirometry, these tools can help improve the efficiency and accuracy of COPD diagnosis in primary care.",
keywords = "Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Asthma, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Risk Factors, Smoking",
author = "Price, {David Brendan} and Tinkelman, {David G} and Nordyke, {Robert J} and Sharon Isonaka and Halbert, {R J} and {COPD Questionnaire Study Group}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.129.6.1531",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "1531--1539",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scoring system and clinical application of COPD diagnostic questionnaires

AU - Price, David Brendan

AU - Tinkelman, David G

AU - Nordyke, Robert J

AU - Isonaka, Sharon

AU - Halbert, R J

AU - COPD Questionnaire Study Group

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Objectives: In most primary care settings, spirometric screening of all patients at risk is not practical. In prior work, we developed questionnaires to help identify COPD in two risk groups: (1) persons with a positive smoking history but no history of obstructive lung disease (case finding), and (2) patients with prior evidence of obstructive lung disease (differential diagnosis). For these questionnaires, we now present a scoring system for use in primary care.Methods: Scores for individual questions were based on the regression coefficients from logistic regression models using a spirometry-based diagnosis of obstruction as the reference outcome. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine performance characteristics for each questionnaire. Several simplified scoring systems were developed and tested.Results: For both scenarios, we created a scoring system with two cut points intended to place subjects within one of three zones: persons with a high likelihood of having obstruction (high predictive value of a positive test result); persons with a low likelihood of obstruction (high predictive value of a negative test result); and an intermediate zone. Using these scoring systems, we achieved sensitivities of 54 to 82%, specificities of 58 to 88%, positive predictive values of 30 to 78%, and negative predictive values of 71 to 93%.Conclusions: These questionnaires can be used to help identify persons likely to have COPD among specific risk groups. The use of a simplified scoring system makes these tools beneficial in the primary care setting. Used in conjunction with spirometry, these tools can help improve the efficiency and accuracy of COPD diagnosis in primary care.

AB - Objectives: In most primary care settings, spirometric screening of all patients at risk is not practical. In prior work, we developed questionnaires to help identify COPD in two risk groups: (1) persons with a positive smoking history but no history of obstructive lung disease (case finding), and (2) patients with prior evidence of obstructive lung disease (differential diagnosis). For these questionnaires, we now present a scoring system for use in primary care.Methods: Scores for individual questions were based on the regression coefficients from logistic regression models using a spirometry-based diagnosis of obstruction as the reference outcome. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine performance characteristics for each questionnaire. Several simplified scoring systems were developed and tested.Results: For both scenarios, we created a scoring system with two cut points intended to place subjects within one of three zones: persons with a high likelihood of having obstruction (high predictive value of a positive test result); persons with a low likelihood of obstruction (high predictive value of a negative test result); and an intermediate zone. Using these scoring systems, we achieved sensitivities of 54 to 82%, specificities of 58 to 88%, positive predictive values of 30 to 78%, and negative predictive values of 71 to 93%.Conclusions: These questionnaires can be used to help identify persons likely to have COPD among specific risk groups. The use of a simplified scoring system makes these tools beneficial in the primary care setting. Used in conjunction with spirometry, these tools can help improve the efficiency and accuracy of COPD diagnosis in primary care.

KW - Adult

KW - Age Factors

KW - Aged

KW - Asthma

KW - Diagnosis, Differential

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

KW - Questionnaires

KW - ROC Curve

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Smoking

U2 - 10.1378/chest.129.6.1531

DO - 10.1378/chest.129.6.1531

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 1531

EP - 1539

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -