Self-Reference Acts as a Golden Thread in Binding

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Glyn Humphreys and I proposed a model of how self-reference enhances binding in perception and cognition [1]. We showed that self-reference changes particular functional processes; notably, self-reference increases binding between the features of stimuli and between different stages of processing. Lane and colleagues [2] provide an interesting comment on our article that suggests our theory of self-reference is compatible with Dennett's philosophical perspective on the narrative nature of the self. Although the nature of the self has attracted the attention of both philosophers and scientists, the two disciplines have generated different perspectives on the functions of the self, largely due to their different methodologies. For example, Dennett argues that the self is constituted through human narration on experience [3]. By contrast, work from psychologists and cognitive neuroscientists focuses on the functional and neural mechanisms of self-reference.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-483
Number of pages2
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume20
Issue number7
Early online date14 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments
The author dedicates this paper to the memory of Glyn W. Humphreys (1954–2016), especially Glyn's invaluable contribution to the theory of self-reference. It was an honor and a privilege to work with him. This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust (WT 106164MA), the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K013424/1), and the National Science Foundation (31371017).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Reference Acts as a Golden Thread in Binding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this