Slaughtering the goose that lays the golden egg: Are whaling and whale-watching mutually exclusive?

James E.S. Higham, David Lusseau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tourism interests usually coexist in a delicate balance with other human interests (e.g. residential development and recreational interests) and activities (e.g. fishing, forestry and mining). Such interests and activities may be compatible or incompatible with tourism to varying degrees. Where incompatibility arises it must be carefully managed through compromise, spatial segregation or exclusivity. Conflicting interests between whale-watching and whaling is one topical such case. Events in recent years, such as the Icelandic government's decision to resume scientific whaling in 2003 have drawn considerable attention to this issue. This is a matter that received some attention at the meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in July 2006. In response to recent debate, this paper highlights the need for a better understanding of tourist views on issues of relevance to whale-watching, noting a number of increasingly topical questions that remain unanswered at present. In doing so it calls for empirical research into the values and views of tourists, actual and latent, on whaling and wider issues of animal welfare. Insights into precisely where tourists stand on issues relating to the whaling/whale-watching debate, and how that may bear upon demand for whale-watching in different national and regional contexts, has become a heightened priority in light of recent events.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-74
Number of pages12
JournalCurrent Issues in Tourism
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

Fingerprint

whaling
whale
egg
tourist
tourism
Tourism
animal welfare
residential development
event
incompatibility
forestry
segregation
compromise
empirical research
fishing
animal
welfare
Whaling
Egg
present

Keywords

  • whaling
  • whale-watching
  • tourism
  • sustainability
  • International Whaling Commission (IWC)

Cite this

Slaughtering the goose that lays the golden egg : Are whaling and whale-watching mutually exclusive? / Higham, James E.S.; Lusseau, David.

In: Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 63-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{feecdabcdb3549c0a55be269ca461093,
title = "Slaughtering the goose that lays the golden egg: Are whaling and whale-watching mutually exclusive?",
abstract = "Tourism interests usually coexist in a delicate balance with other human interests (e.g. residential development and recreational interests) and activities (e.g. fishing, forestry and mining). Such interests and activities may be compatible or incompatible with tourism to varying degrees. Where incompatibility arises it must be carefully managed through compromise, spatial segregation or exclusivity. Conflicting interests between whale-watching and whaling is one topical such case. Events in recent years, such as the Icelandic government's decision to resume scientific whaling in 2003 have drawn considerable attention to this issue. This is a matter that received some attention at the meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in July 2006. In response to recent debate, this paper highlights the need for a better understanding of tourist views on issues of relevance to whale-watching, noting a number of increasingly topical questions that remain unanswered at present. In doing so it calls for empirical research into the values and views of tourists, actual and latent, on whaling and wider issues of animal welfare. Insights into precisely where tourists stand on issues relating to the whaling/whale-watching debate, and how that may bear upon demand for whale-watching in different national and regional contexts, has become a heightened priority in light of recent events.",
keywords = "whaling, whale-watching, tourism, sustainability, International Whaling Commission (IWC)",
author = "Higham, {James E.S.} and David Lusseau",
note = "Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2167/cit335.0",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "63--74",
journal = "Current Issues in Tourism",
issn = "1368-3500",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Slaughtering the goose that lays the golden egg

T2 - Are whaling and whale-watching mutually exclusive?

AU - Higham, James E.S.

AU - Lusseau, David

N1 - Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Tourism interests usually coexist in a delicate balance with other human interests (e.g. residential development and recreational interests) and activities (e.g. fishing, forestry and mining). Such interests and activities may be compatible or incompatible with tourism to varying degrees. Where incompatibility arises it must be carefully managed through compromise, spatial segregation or exclusivity. Conflicting interests between whale-watching and whaling is one topical such case. Events in recent years, such as the Icelandic government's decision to resume scientific whaling in 2003 have drawn considerable attention to this issue. This is a matter that received some attention at the meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in July 2006. In response to recent debate, this paper highlights the need for a better understanding of tourist views on issues of relevance to whale-watching, noting a number of increasingly topical questions that remain unanswered at present. In doing so it calls for empirical research into the values and views of tourists, actual and latent, on whaling and wider issues of animal welfare. Insights into precisely where tourists stand on issues relating to the whaling/whale-watching debate, and how that may bear upon demand for whale-watching in different national and regional contexts, has become a heightened priority in light of recent events.

AB - Tourism interests usually coexist in a delicate balance with other human interests (e.g. residential development and recreational interests) and activities (e.g. fishing, forestry and mining). Such interests and activities may be compatible or incompatible with tourism to varying degrees. Where incompatibility arises it must be carefully managed through compromise, spatial segregation or exclusivity. Conflicting interests between whale-watching and whaling is one topical such case. Events in recent years, such as the Icelandic government's decision to resume scientific whaling in 2003 have drawn considerable attention to this issue. This is a matter that received some attention at the meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in July 2006. In response to recent debate, this paper highlights the need for a better understanding of tourist views on issues of relevance to whale-watching, noting a number of increasingly topical questions that remain unanswered at present. In doing so it calls for empirical research into the values and views of tourists, actual and latent, on whaling and wider issues of animal welfare. Insights into precisely where tourists stand on issues relating to the whaling/whale-watching debate, and how that may bear upon demand for whale-watching in different national and regional contexts, has become a heightened priority in light of recent events.

KW - whaling

KW - whale-watching

KW - tourism

KW - sustainability

KW - International Whaling Commission (IWC)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40049085593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2167/cit335.0

DO - 10.2167/cit335.0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:40049085593

VL - 11

SP - 63

EP - 74

JO - Current Issues in Tourism

JF - Current Issues in Tourism

SN - 1368-3500

IS - 1

ER -