Social Contact, Cultural Marginality or Economic Self-Interest? Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Northern Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although scholars of mass political behaviour have proposed various explanations for why an individual would oppose immigration, the relative impact of these various explanations has rarely been assessed. It is with this omission in mind that this study assesses empirically three alternative theories in explaining attitudes towards immigrants: the social contact hypothesis, cultural marginality and economic self-interest. Using the 2003 Northern Ireland component of the European Social Survey the results suggest that social exposure and cultural marginality are the two key explanations, independently important, in predicting pro-immigration attitudes within this society. Of these two theoretical perspectives, however, social exposure, particularly in terms of having a previously established friendship network of immigrants, stands out as the most important and consistent predictor of attitudes. It is to these two factors, especially prior social exposure, that pro-immigrant politicians and policy makers should direct their attention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-476
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Ethnic & Migration Studies
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • immigrants
  • attitudes
  • social contact
  • cultural marginality
  • Northern Ireland
  • COMMUNITY-RELATIONS
  • EXTREME-RIGHT
  • PARTIES

Cite this

@article{eb226633035f464ba09247e9107fb0ec,
title = "Social Contact, Cultural Marginality or Economic Self-Interest? Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "Although scholars of mass political behaviour have proposed various explanations for why an individual would oppose immigration, the relative impact of these various explanations has rarely been assessed. It is with this omission in mind that this study assesses empirically three alternative theories in explaining attitudes towards immigrants: the social contact hypothesis, cultural marginality and economic self-interest. Using the 2003 Northern Ireland component of the European Social Survey the results suggest that social exposure and cultural marginality are the two key explanations, independently important, in predicting pro-immigration attitudes within this society. Of these two theoretical perspectives, however, social exposure, particularly in terms of having a previously established friendship network of immigrants, stands out as the most important and consistent predictor of attitudes. It is to these two factors, especially prior social exposure, that pro-immigrant politicians and policy makers should direct their attention.",
keywords = "immigrants, attitudes, social contact, cultural marginality, Northern Ireland, COMMUNITY-RELATIONS, EXTREME-RIGHT, PARTIES",
author = "Hayes, {Bernadette C} and L. Dowds",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/13691830600554890",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "455--476",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Contact, Cultural Marginality or Economic Self-Interest? Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Northern Ireland

AU - Hayes, Bernadette C

AU - Dowds, L.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Although scholars of mass political behaviour have proposed various explanations for why an individual would oppose immigration, the relative impact of these various explanations has rarely been assessed. It is with this omission in mind that this study assesses empirically three alternative theories in explaining attitudes towards immigrants: the social contact hypothesis, cultural marginality and economic self-interest. Using the 2003 Northern Ireland component of the European Social Survey the results suggest that social exposure and cultural marginality are the two key explanations, independently important, in predicting pro-immigration attitudes within this society. Of these two theoretical perspectives, however, social exposure, particularly in terms of having a previously established friendship network of immigrants, stands out as the most important and consistent predictor of attitudes. It is to these two factors, especially prior social exposure, that pro-immigrant politicians and policy makers should direct their attention.

AB - Although scholars of mass political behaviour have proposed various explanations for why an individual would oppose immigration, the relative impact of these various explanations has rarely been assessed. It is with this omission in mind that this study assesses empirically three alternative theories in explaining attitudes towards immigrants: the social contact hypothesis, cultural marginality and economic self-interest. Using the 2003 Northern Ireland component of the European Social Survey the results suggest that social exposure and cultural marginality are the two key explanations, independently important, in predicting pro-immigration attitudes within this society. Of these two theoretical perspectives, however, social exposure, particularly in terms of having a previously established friendship network of immigrants, stands out as the most important and consistent predictor of attitudes. It is to these two factors, especially prior social exposure, that pro-immigrant politicians and policy makers should direct their attention.

KW - immigrants

KW - attitudes

KW - social contact

KW - cultural marginality

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - COMMUNITY-RELATIONS

KW - EXTREME-RIGHT

KW - PARTIES

U2 - 10.1080/13691830600554890

DO - 10.1080/13691830600554890

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 455

EP - 476

JO - Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 3

ER -