Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism

Max Horkheimer on Religion

Christopher Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay examines the fragmentary writings of Max Horkheimer on religion. It demonstrates that Horkheimer was consistently drawn to refection on religion throughout his life in response to limitations he perceived within Marxist theory and practice. While he agreed with Marx that the “criticism of religion is the premise of all criticism,” he did not think that “the criticism of religion has been largely complete.” As he struggled to overcome the dogmatism he saw in the Marxism of his age, and in the dominance of scientific method, Horkheimer looked to religion as a site in which one encountered a negative concept of truth, and a substantive moral longing for justice. The essay concludes by exploring two critical evaluations of Hokheimer's perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-168
Number of pages16
JournalCritical Sociology
Volume31
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

criticism
Religion
Marxism
dogmatism
justice
evaluation

Keywords

  • critical theory
  • Horkheimer
  • religion

Cite this

Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism : Max Horkheimer on Religion. / Brittain, Christopher.

In: Critical Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 01.2005, p. 153-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brittain, Christopher. / Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism : Max Horkheimer on Religion. In: Critical Sociology. 2005 ; Vol. 31, No. 1-2. pp. 153-168.
@article{523bb85f8d4c42cca895a9edea637087,
title = "Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism: Max Horkheimer on Religion",
abstract = "This essay examines the fragmentary writings of Max Horkheimer on religion. It demonstrates that Horkheimer was consistently drawn to refection on religion throughout his life in response to limitations he perceived within Marxist theory and practice. While he agreed with Marx that the “criticism of religion is the premise of all criticism,” he did not think that “the criticism of religion has been largely complete.” As he struggled to overcome the dogmatism he saw in the Marxism of his age, and in the dominance of scientific method, Horkheimer looked to religion as a site in which one encountered a negative concept of truth, and a substantive moral longing for justice. The essay concludes by exploring two critical evaluations of Hokheimer's perspective.",
keywords = "critical theory, Horkheimer , religion",
author = "Christopher Brittain",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1163/1569163053084379",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "153--168",
journal = "Critical Sociology",
issn = "0896-9205",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Theory and the Premise of all Criticism

T2 - Max Horkheimer on Religion

AU - Brittain, Christopher

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - This essay examines the fragmentary writings of Max Horkheimer on religion. It demonstrates that Horkheimer was consistently drawn to refection on religion throughout his life in response to limitations he perceived within Marxist theory and practice. While he agreed with Marx that the “criticism of religion is the premise of all criticism,” he did not think that “the criticism of religion has been largely complete.” As he struggled to overcome the dogmatism he saw in the Marxism of his age, and in the dominance of scientific method, Horkheimer looked to religion as a site in which one encountered a negative concept of truth, and a substantive moral longing for justice. The essay concludes by exploring two critical evaluations of Hokheimer's perspective.

AB - This essay examines the fragmentary writings of Max Horkheimer on religion. It demonstrates that Horkheimer was consistently drawn to refection on religion throughout his life in response to limitations he perceived within Marxist theory and practice. While he agreed with Marx that the “criticism of religion is the premise of all criticism,” he did not think that “the criticism of religion has been largely complete.” As he struggled to overcome the dogmatism he saw in the Marxism of his age, and in the dominance of scientific method, Horkheimer looked to religion as a site in which one encountered a negative concept of truth, and a substantive moral longing for justice. The essay concludes by exploring two critical evaluations of Hokheimer's perspective.

KW - critical theory

KW - Horkheimer

KW - religion

U2 - 10.1163/1569163053084379

DO - 10.1163/1569163053084379

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 153

EP - 168

JO - Critical Sociology

JF - Critical Sociology

SN - 0896-9205

IS - 1-2

ER -