Soil storage as affected by tillage and straw management

an assessment using field measurements and model predictions

Kees Van Groenigen, Astley Hastings, Dermott Forristal, Brendan Roth, Mike Jones, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soil tillage and straw management are both known to affect soil organic matter dynamics. However, it is still unclear whether, or how, these two practices interact to affect soil C storage, and data from long term studies are scarce. Soil C models may help to overcome some of these problems. Here we compare direct measurements of soil C contents from a 9 year old tillage experiment to predictions made by RothC and a cohort model. Soil samples were collected from plots in an Irish winter wheat field that were exposed to either conventional (CT) or shallow non-inversion tillage (RT). Crop residue was removed from half of the RT and CT plots after harvest, allowing us to test for interactive effects between tillage practices and strawmanagement. Within the 0–30 cm layer, soil C contents were significantly increased both by straw retention and by RT. Tillage and strawmanagement did not interact to determine the total amount of soil C in this layer. The highest average soil C contents (68.9 ± 2.8 Mg C ha-1) were found for the combination of RT with straw incorporation, whereas the lowest average soil C contents (57.3 ± 2.3 Mg C ha-1) were found for CT with straw removal. We found no significant treatment effects on soil C contents at lower depths. Both models suggest that at our site, RT stimulates soil C storage largely by decreasing the decomposition of old soil C. Extrapolating our findings to the rest of Ireland, we estimate that RT will lead to C mitigation ranging from 0.18 to 1.0 Mg C ha-1 y-1 relative to CT, with the mitigation rate depending on the initial SOC level. However, on-farm assessments are still needed to determine whether RT management practices can be adopted under Irish conditions without detrimental effects on crop yield.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-225
Number of pages8
JournalAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Volume140
Issue number1-2
Early online date11 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • tillage
  • soil C storage
  • straw management
  • soil C modelling
  • profile carbon sequestration
  • long-term experiments
  • on-farm assessment
  • organic-matter
  • no-tillage
  • European soils
  • climate-change
  • crop residue
  • agriculture
  • turnover

Cite this

Soil storage as affected by tillage and straw management : an assessment using field measurements and model predictions. / Van Groenigen, Kees; Hastings, Astley; Forristal, Dermott; Roth, Brendan; Jones, Mike ; Smith, Pete.

In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 140, No. 1-2, 30.01.2011, p. 218-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77884bb4cbfb4a98bd238450823b9fd5,
title = "Soil storage as affected by tillage and straw management: an assessment using field measurements and model predictions",
abstract = "Soil tillage and straw management are both known to affect soil organic matter dynamics. However, it is still unclear whether, or how, these two practices interact to affect soil C storage, and data from long term studies are scarce. Soil C models may help to overcome some of these problems. Here we compare direct measurements of soil C contents from a 9 year old tillage experiment to predictions made by RothC and a cohort model. Soil samples were collected from plots in an Irish winter wheat field that were exposed to either conventional (CT) or shallow non-inversion tillage (RT). Crop residue was removed from half of the RT and CT plots after harvest, allowing us to test for interactive effects between tillage practices and strawmanagement. Within the 0–30 cm layer, soil C contents were significantly increased both by straw retention and by RT. Tillage and strawmanagement did not interact to determine the total amount of soil C in this layer. The highest average soil C contents (68.9 ± 2.8 Mg C ha-1) were found for the combination of RT with straw incorporation, whereas the lowest average soil C contents (57.3 ± 2.3 Mg C ha-1) were found for CT with straw removal. We found no significant treatment effects on soil C contents at lower depths. Both models suggest that at our site, RT stimulates soil C storage largely by decreasing the decomposition of old soil C. Extrapolating our findings to the rest of Ireland, we estimate that RT will lead to C mitigation ranging from 0.18 to 1.0 Mg C ha-1 y-1 relative to CT, with the mitigation rate depending on the initial SOC level. However, on-farm assessments are still needed to determine whether RT management practices can be adopted under Irish conditions without detrimental effects on crop yield.",
keywords = "tillage, soil C storage, straw management, soil C modelling, profile carbon sequestration, long-term experiments, on-farm assessment, organic-matter, no-tillage, European soils, climate-change, crop residue, agriculture, turnover",
author = "{Van Groenigen}, Kees and Astley Hastings and Dermott Forristal and Brendan Roth and Mike Jones and Pete Smith",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "218--225",
journal = "Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil storage as affected by tillage and straw management

T2 - an assessment using field measurements and model predictions

AU - Van Groenigen, Kees

AU - Hastings, Astley

AU - Forristal, Dermott

AU - Roth, Brendan

AU - Jones, Mike

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2011/1/30

Y1 - 2011/1/30

N2 - Soil tillage and straw management are both known to affect soil organic matter dynamics. However, it is still unclear whether, or how, these two practices interact to affect soil C storage, and data from long term studies are scarce. Soil C models may help to overcome some of these problems. Here we compare direct measurements of soil C contents from a 9 year old tillage experiment to predictions made by RothC and a cohort model. Soil samples were collected from plots in an Irish winter wheat field that were exposed to either conventional (CT) or shallow non-inversion tillage (RT). Crop residue was removed from half of the RT and CT plots after harvest, allowing us to test for interactive effects between tillage practices and strawmanagement. Within the 0–30 cm layer, soil C contents were significantly increased both by straw retention and by RT. Tillage and strawmanagement did not interact to determine the total amount of soil C in this layer. The highest average soil C contents (68.9 ± 2.8 Mg C ha-1) were found for the combination of RT with straw incorporation, whereas the lowest average soil C contents (57.3 ± 2.3 Mg C ha-1) were found for CT with straw removal. We found no significant treatment effects on soil C contents at lower depths. Both models suggest that at our site, RT stimulates soil C storage largely by decreasing the decomposition of old soil C. Extrapolating our findings to the rest of Ireland, we estimate that RT will lead to C mitigation ranging from 0.18 to 1.0 Mg C ha-1 y-1 relative to CT, with the mitigation rate depending on the initial SOC level. However, on-farm assessments are still needed to determine whether RT management practices can be adopted under Irish conditions without detrimental effects on crop yield.

AB - Soil tillage and straw management are both known to affect soil organic matter dynamics. However, it is still unclear whether, or how, these two practices interact to affect soil C storage, and data from long term studies are scarce. Soil C models may help to overcome some of these problems. Here we compare direct measurements of soil C contents from a 9 year old tillage experiment to predictions made by RothC and a cohort model. Soil samples were collected from plots in an Irish winter wheat field that were exposed to either conventional (CT) or shallow non-inversion tillage (RT). Crop residue was removed from half of the RT and CT plots after harvest, allowing us to test for interactive effects between tillage practices and strawmanagement. Within the 0–30 cm layer, soil C contents were significantly increased both by straw retention and by RT. Tillage and strawmanagement did not interact to determine the total amount of soil C in this layer. The highest average soil C contents (68.9 ± 2.8 Mg C ha-1) were found for the combination of RT with straw incorporation, whereas the lowest average soil C contents (57.3 ± 2.3 Mg C ha-1) were found for CT with straw removal. We found no significant treatment effects on soil C contents at lower depths. Both models suggest that at our site, RT stimulates soil C storage largely by decreasing the decomposition of old soil C. Extrapolating our findings to the rest of Ireland, we estimate that RT will lead to C mitigation ranging from 0.18 to 1.0 Mg C ha-1 y-1 relative to CT, with the mitigation rate depending on the initial SOC level. However, on-farm assessments are still needed to determine whether RT management practices can be adopted under Irish conditions without detrimental effects on crop yield.

KW - tillage

KW - soil C storage

KW - straw management

KW - soil C modelling

KW - profile carbon sequestration

KW - long-term experiments

KW - on-farm assessment

KW - organic-matter

KW - no-tillage

KW - European soils

KW - climate-change

KW - crop residue

KW - agriculture

KW - turnover

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 140

SP - 218

EP - 225

JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 1-2

ER -