Soul Citizens: how Christians understand their political role

Bernd Wannenwetsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Investigating how Christians best understand their political role on the receiving
side of political authority, the essay revisits the older “citizens versus subject”
debate and presents exegetical, doctrinal and historical considerations that
suggest keep this tension alive instead of seeking to dissolve it on either side.
The author argues that the peculiar interweaving of “citizen” and “subject”
traditions characterizes the Christian attitude towards political authority from
the outset. This is demonstrated by a fresh reading of Romans 13 in which the
arguably “conservative” origin of Christian political thought is shown to bear
clear, albeit often overlooked, marks of a genuine “citizen” ethics. Extemporising
on Luther’s commentary on Romans 13, the essay demonstrates how
the idea of a Christian as “subject-as-citizen” is rooted in a theological refusal
to compartmentalize the human existence into separate spheres of authority.
As “embodied soul” the Christian responds to political authority in a way that
engages the human being in all its faculties, simultaneously free and bound.
The essay concludes by suggesting that the crucial shift in the more recent
history of political thought can be explained more readily as a shift from this
theologically motivated duality towards a monochrome political voluntarism
that insisted a citizen’s submission to political rule could be conceived as
essentially submission to one’s own will.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373–394
Number of pages22
JournalPolitical Theology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

citizen
moral philosophy
human being
Political Authority
Political Thought

Keywords

  • Christian citizenship
  • citizenship
  • education
  • political authority
  • political theology
  • Romans 13
  • state
  • subject

Cite this

Soul Citizens : how Christians understand their political role. / Wannenwetsch, Bernd.

In: Political Theology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2008, p. 373–394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wannenwetsch, Bernd. / Soul Citizens : how Christians understand their political role. In: Political Theology. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 373–394.
@article{abc0aeb4f0fd4961ba82d44e7be4aa25,
title = "Soul Citizens: how Christians understand their political role",
abstract = "Investigating how Christians best understand their political role on the receiving side of political authority, the essay revisits the older “citizens versus subject” debate and presents exegetical, doctrinal and historical considerations that suggest keep this tension alive instead of seeking to dissolve it on either side. The author argues that the peculiar interweaving of “citizen” and “subject” traditions characterizes the Christian attitude towards political authority from the outset. This is demonstrated by a fresh reading of Romans 13 in which the arguably “conservative” origin of Christian political thought is shown to bear clear, albeit often overlooked, marks of a genuine “citizen” ethics. Extemporising on Luther’s commentary on Romans 13, the essay demonstrates how the idea of a Christian as “subject-as-citizen” is rooted in a theological refusal to compartmentalize the human existence into separate spheres of authority. As “embodied soul” the Christian responds to political authority in a way that engages the human being in all its faculties, simultaneously free and bound. The essay concludes by suggesting that the crucial shift in the more recent history of political thought can be explained more readily as a shift from this theologically motivated duality towards a monochrome political voluntarism that insisted a citizen’s submission to political rule could be conceived as essentially submission to one’s own will.",
keywords = "Christian citizenship, citizenship, education, political authority, political theology, Romans 13, state, subject",
author = "Bernd Wannenwetsch",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1558/poth.v9i3.373",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "373–394",
journal = "Political Theology",
issn = "1462-317X",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soul Citizens

T2 - how Christians understand their political role

AU - Wannenwetsch, Bernd

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Investigating how Christians best understand their political role on the receiving side of political authority, the essay revisits the older “citizens versus subject” debate and presents exegetical, doctrinal and historical considerations that suggest keep this tension alive instead of seeking to dissolve it on either side. The author argues that the peculiar interweaving of “citizen” and “subject” traditions characterizes the Christian attitude towards political authority from the outset. This is demonstrated by a fresh reading of Romans 13 in which the arguably “conservative” origin of Christian political thought is shown to bear clear, albeit often overlooked, marks of a genuine “citizen” ethics. Extemporising on Luther’s commentary on Romans 13, the essay demonstrates how the idea of a Christian as “subject-as-citizen” is rooted in a theological refusal to compartmentalize the human existence into separate spheres of authority. As “embodied soul” the Christian responds to political authority in a way that engages the human being in all its faculties, simultaneously free and bound. The essay concludes by suggesting that the crucial shift in the more recent history of political thought can be explained more readily as a shift from this theologically motivated duality towards a monochrome political voluntarism that insisted a citizen’s submission to political rule could be conceived as essentially submission to one’s own will.

AB - Investigating how Christians best understand their political role on the receiving side of political authority, the essay revisits the older “citizens versus subject” debate and presents exegetical, doctrinal and historical considerations that suggest keep this tension alive instead of seeking to dissolve it on either side. The author argues that the peculiar interweaving of “citizen” and “subject” traditions characterizes the Christian attitude towards political authority from the outset. This is demonstrated by a fresh reading of Romans 13 in which the arguably “conservative” origin of Christian political thought is shown to bear clear, albeit often overlooked, marks of a genuine “citizen” ethics. Extemporising on Luther’s commentary on Romans 13, the essay demonstrates how the idea of a Christian as “subject-as-citizen” is rooted in a theological refusal to compartmentalize the human existence into separate spheres of authority. As “embodied soul” the Christian responds to political authority in a way that engages the human being in all its faculties, simultaneously free and bound. The essay concludes by suggesting that the crucial shift in the more recent history of political thought can be explained more readily as a shift from this theologically motivated duality towards a monochrome political voluntarism that insisted a citizen’s submission to political rule could be conceived as essentially submission to one’s own will.

KW - Christian citizenship

KW - citizenship

KW - education

KW - political authority

KW - political theology

KW - Romans 13

KW - state

KW - subject

U2 - 10.1558/poth.v9i3.373

DO - 10.1558/poth.v9i3.373

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 373

EP - 394

JO - Political Theology

JF - Political Theology

SN - 1462-317X

IS - 3

ER -