South African NGOs and the public sphere

between popular movements and partnerships for development

Natascha Mueller-Hirth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the widespread notion that post-apartheid democracy can be deepened and civil society strengthened by NGO activities in the sphere of public debate and participation. I focus on a number of interrelated processes which I argue may compromise NGOs' ability to expand the public sphere: first, donors' overwhelming focus on NGOs as the sole representative of civil society may contribute to a homogenous and institutionalised public sphere; second, the tendency for NGOs to be drawn into partnerships with government bodies and corporate sponsors casts doubt on their ability to open up spaces for critical public debate. By directing attention to popular movements as potentially offering a site for the production of critique, NGOs' relationships to such movements are examined. It is argued that attention must be paid to the processes of NGO-isation and reformism by which NGOs themselves come to define what civil society should be and may consequently contain counterpublic spheres.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-435
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Dynamics
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

non-governmental organization
civil society
reformism
ability
apartheid
compromise
democracy
participation

Keywords

  • NGO
  • civil society
  • South Africa
  • social movement
  • counterpublics

Cite this

South African NGOs and the public sphere : between popular movements and partnerships for development. / Mueller-Hirth, Natascha.

In: Social Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2009, p. 423-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbbab0f27a074f0bb68c2d0a01ef1562,
title = "South African NGOs and the public sphere: between popular movements and partnerships for development",
abstract = "This article examines the widespread notion that post-apartheid democracy can be deepened and civil society strengthened by NGO activities in the sphere of public debate and participation. I focus on a number of interrelated processes which I argue may compromise NGOs' ability to expand the public sphere: first, donors' overwhelming focus on NGOs as the sole representative of civil society may contribute to a homogenous and institutionalised public sphere; second, the tendency for NGOs to be drawn into partnerships with government bodies and corporate sponsors casts doubt on their ability to open up spaces for critical public debate. By directing attention to popular movements as potentially offering a site for the production of critique, NGOs' relationships to such movements are examined. It is argued that attention must be paid to the processes of NGO-isation and reformism by which NGOs themselves come to define what civil society should be and may consequently contain counterpublic spheres.",
keywords = "NGO, civil society, South Africa, social movement, counterpublics",
author = "Natascha Mueller-Hirth",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/02533950903076568",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "423--435",
journal = "Social Dynamics",
issn = "0253-3952",
publisher = "Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - South African NGOs and the public sphere

T2 - between popular movements and partnerships for development

AU - Mueller-Hirth, Natascha

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article examines the widespread notion that post-apartheid democracy can be deepened and civil society strengthened by NGO activities in the sphere of public debate and participation. I focus on a number of interrelated processes which I argue may compromise NGOs' ability to expand the public sphere: first, donors' overwhelming focus on NGOs as the sole representative of civil society may contribute to a homogenous and institutionalised public sphere; second, the tendency for NGOs to be drawn into partnerships with government bodies and corporate sponsors casts doubt on their ability to open up spaces for critical public debate. By directing attention to popular movements as potentially offering a site for the production of critique, NGOs' relationships to such movements are examined. It is argued that attention must be paid to the processes of NGO-isation and reformism by which NGOs themselves come to define what civil society should be and may consequently contain counterpublic spheres.

AB - This article examines the widespread notion that post-apartheid democracy can be deepened and civil society strengthened by NGO activities in the sphere of public debate and participation. I focus on a number of interrelated processes which I argue may compromise NGOs' ability to expand the public sphere: first, donors' overwhelming focus on NGOs as the sole representative of civil society may contribute to a homogenous and institutionalised public sphere; second, the tendency for NGOs to be drawn into partnerships with government bodies and corporate sponsors casts doubt on their ability to open up spaces for critical public debate. By directing attention to popular movements as potentially offering a site for the production of critique, NGOs' relationships to such movements are examined. It is argued that attention must be paid to the processes of NGO-isation and reformism by which NGOs themselves come to define what civil society should be and may consequently contain counterpublic spheres.

KW - NGO

KW - civil society

KW - South Africa

KW - social movement

KW - counterpublics

U2 - 10.1080/02533950903076568

DO - 10.1080/02533950903076568

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 423

EP - 435

JO - Social Dynamics

JF - Social Dynamics

SN - 0253-3952

IS - 2

ER -