Syrian science and smart supermodels: On the how and when of perception-behaviour effects.

G. Haddock, C Neil MacRae, S. Fleck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although research has revealed that the activation of a social category can influence subsequent behavior, a number of unresolved issues remain. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether people's ability to learn new information would be influenced by accessible knowledge representations. Extending previous research, we predicted that behavior would differ as a function of the type and direction of primed information. The results supported the hypothesis: Test performance on a previously unfamiliar topic was enhanced when individuals had previously thought about either a category associated with intelligence or an exemplar from a category associated with unintelligence. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether a common set of priming stimuli can produce both assimilation and contrast effects. Based on Mussweiler's (in press) Selective Accessibility Model, we predicted that having participants focus on the similarities among a set of supermodels would elicit behavioral assimilation, whereas a dissimilarity focus would elicit behavioral contrast. The results supported the hypothesis: Participants behaved unintelligently under a similarity focus and intelligently under a dissimilarity focus. The implications of the findings for perception-behavior effects and the Selective Accessibility Model are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-481
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • CONTRAST
  • JUDGMENT
  • TRAIT
  • ACCESSIBILITY
  • ASSIMILATION
  • ACTIVATION

Cite this

Syrian science and smart supermodels: On the how and when of perception-behaviour effects. / Haddock, G.; MacRae, C Neil; Fleck, S.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 20, 2002, p. 461-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc4cad149b5747868d8602057f9425b9,
title = "Syrian science and smart supermodels: On the how and when of perception-behaviour effects.",
abstract = "Although research has revealed that the activation of a social category can influence subsequent behavior, a number of unresolved issues remain. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether people's ability to learn new information would be influenced by accessible knowledge representations. Extending previous research, we predicted that behavior would differ as a function of the type and direction of primed information. The results supported the hypothesis: Test performance on a previously unfamiliar topic was enhanced when individuals had previously thought about either a category associated with intelligence or an exemplar from a category associated with unintelligence. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether a common set of priming stimuli can produce both assimilation and contrast effects. Based on Mussweiler's (in press) Selective Accessibility Model, we predicted that having participants focus on the similarities among a set of supermodels would elicit behavioral assimilation, whereas a dissimilarity focus would elicit behavioral contrast. The results supported the hypothesis: Participants behaved unintelligently under a similarity focus and intelligently under a dissimilarity focus. The implications of the findings for perception-behavior effects and the Selective Accessibility Model are discussed.",
keywords = "CONTRAST, JUDGMENT, TRAIT, ACCESSIBILITY, ASSIMILATION, ACTIVATION",
author = "G. Haddock and MacRae, {C Neil} and S. Fleck",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1521/soco.20.6.461.22976",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "461--481",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Syrian science and smart supermodels: On the how and when of perception-behaviour effects.

AU - Haddock, G.

AU - MacRae, C Neil

AU - Fleck, S.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Although research has revealed that the activation of a social category can influence subsequent behavior, a number of unresolved issues remain. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether people's ability to learn new information would be influenced by accessible knowledge representations. Extending previous research, we predicted that behavior would differ as a function of the type and direction of primed information. The results supported the hypothesis: Test performance on a previously unfamiliar topic was enhanced when individuals had previously thought about either a category associated with intelligence or an exemplar from a category associated with unintelligence. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether a common set of priming stimuli can produce both assimilation and contrast effects. Based on Mussweiler's (in press) Selective Accessibility Model, we predicted that having participants focus on the similarities among a set of supermodels would elicit behavioral assimilation, whereas a dissimilarity focus would elicit behavioral contrast. The results supported the hypothesis: Participants behaved unintelligently under a similarity focus and intelligently under a dissimilarity focus. The implications of the findings for perception-behavior effects and the Selective Accessibility Model are discussed.

AB - Although research has revealed that the activation of a social category can influence subsequent behavior, a number of unresolved issues remain. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether people's ability to learn new information would be influenced by accessible knowledge representations. Extending previous research, we predicted that behavior would differ as a function of the type and direction of primed information. The results supported the hypothesis: Test performance on a previously unfamiliar topic was enhanced when individuals had previously thought about either a category associated with intelligence or an exemplar from a category associated with unintelligence. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether a common set of priming stimuli can produce both assimilation and contrast effects. Based on Mussweiler's (in press) Selective Accessibility Model, we predicted that having participants focus on the similarities among a set of supermodels would elicit behavioral assimilation, whereas a dissimilarity focus would elicit behavioral contrast. The results supported the hypothesis: Participants behaved unintelligently under a similarity focus and intelligently under a dissimilarity focus. The implications of the findings for perception-behavior effects and the Selective Accessibility Model are discussed.

KW - CONTRAST

KW - JUDGMENT

KW - TRAIT

KW - ACCESSIBILITY

KW - ASSIMILATION

KW - ACTIVATION

U2 - 10.1521/soco.20.6.461.22976

DO - 10.1521/soco.20.6.461.22976

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 461

EP - 481

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

ER -