Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring

Elizabeth M Russell, Julie Bruce, Zygmunt H Krukowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Mortality is the most tightly defined and used adverse event for audit and performance monitoring in surgery. However, to identify cause and therefore scope for improvement, accurate and timely data are required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the quality of measurement, reporting and monitoring of mortality as an outcome after surgery.

Methods: A systematic review of published literature was undertaken for the 7-year interval 1993-1999. Grey and unpublished literature was obtained through the Royal College of Surgeons of England, from UK national audits and routine national hospital data collections.

Results: Eligible monitoring systems included six UK national surgical audits, and cardiac and vascular surgery monitoring systems from North America and the UK. The definitions of 'surgical death' varied in several respects and deaths after discharge from hospital were rarely ascertained unless there was routine linkage to national death registers. There were very few published studies on validation of the completeness and accuracy of the data collection.

Conclusion: A comprehensive data collection system is needed for improving clinical performance, with ownership, but not necessarily data collection, resting with the surgeons concerned. Recording of risk factors and deaths after discharge from hospital is essential, whatever data collection system is used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-532
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume90
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • CARDIAC-SURGERY
  • PERIOPERATIVE-DEATHS
  • CONFIDENTIAL-INQUIRY
  • AUDIT
  • PERFORMANCE
  • OUTCOMES
  • DATABASE
  • BEHAVIOR
  • REGISTRY
  • ACCESS

Cite this

Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring. / Russell, Elizabeth M; Bruce, Julie; Krukowski, Zygmunt H.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2003, p. 527-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Russell, Elizabeth M ; Bruce, Julie ; Krukowski, Zygmunt H. / Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 90, No. 5. pp. 527-532.
@article{f5b0186fb3e3467eb0d34a7f2c666792,
title = "Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring",
abstract = "Background: Mortality is the most tightly defined and used adverse event for audit and performance monitoring in surgery. However, to identify cause and therefore scope for improvement, accurate and timely data are required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the quality of measurement, reporting and monitoring of mortality as an outcome after surgery.Methods: A systematic review of published literature was undertaken for the 7-year interval 1993-1999. Grey and unpublished literature was obtained through the Royal College of Surgeons of England, from UK national audits and routine national hospital data collections.Results: Eligible monitoring systems included six UK national surgical audits, and cardiac and vascular surgery monitoring systems from North America and the UK. The definitions of 'surgical death' varied in several respects and deaths after discharge from hospital were rarely ascertained unless there was routine linkage to national death registers. There were very few published studies on validation of the completeness and accuracy of the data collection.Conclusion: A comprehensive data collection system is needed for improving clinical performance, with ownership, but not necessarily data collection, resting with the surgeons concerned. Recording of risk factors and deaths after discharge from hospital is essential, whatever data collection system is used.",
keywords = "CARDIAC-SURGERY, PERIOPERATIVE-DEATHS, CONFIDENTIAL-INQUIRY, AUDIT, PERFORMANCE, OUTCOMES, DATABASE, BEHAVIOR, REGISTRY, ACCESS",
author = "Russell, {Elizabeth M} and Julie Bruce and Krukowski, {Zygmunt H}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.4126",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "527--532",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "British Journal of Surgery",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring

AU - Russell, Elizabeth M

AU - Bruce, Julie

AU - Krukowski, Zygmunt H

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: Mortality is the most tightly defined and used adverse event for audit and performance monitoring in surgery. However, to identify cause and therefore scope for improvement, accurate and timely data are required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the quality of measurement, reporting and monitoring of mortality as an outcome after surgery.Methods: A systematic review of published literature was undertaken for the 7-year interval 1993-1999. Grey and unpublished literature was obtained through the Royal College of Surgeons of England, from UK national audits and routine national hospital data collections.Results: Eligible monitoring systems included six UK national surgical audits, and cardiac and vascular surgery monitoring systems from North America and the UK. The definitions of 'surgical death' varied in several respects and deaths after discharge from hospital were rarely ascertained unless there was routine linkage to national death registers. There were very few published studies on validation of the completeness and accuracy of the data collection.Conclusion: A comprehensive data collection system is needed for improving clinical performance, with ownership, but not necessarily data collection, resting with the surgeons concerned. Recording of risk factors and deaths after discharge from hospital is essential, whatever data collection system is used.

AB - Background: Mortality is the most tightly defined and used adverse event for audit and performance monitoring in surgery. However, to identify cause and therefore scope for improvement, accurate and timely data are required. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the quality of measurement, reporting and monitoring of mortality as an outcome after surgery.Methods: A systematic review of published literature was undertaken for the 7-year interval 1993-1999. Grey and unpublished literature was obtained through the Royal College of Surgeons of England, from UK national audits and routine national hospital data collections.Results: Eligible monitoring systems included six UK national surgical audits, and cardiac and vascular surgery monitoring systems from North America and the UK. The definitions of 'surgical death' varied in several respects and deaths after discharge from hospital were rarely ascertained unless there was routine linkage to national death registers. There were very few published studies on validation of the completeness and accuracy of the data collection.Conclusion: A comprehensive data collection system is needed for improving clinical performance, with ownership, but not necessarily data collection, resting with the surgeons concerned. Recording of risk factors and deaths after discharge from hospital is essential, whatever data collection system is used.

KW - CARDIAC-SURGERY

KW - PERIOPERATIVE-DEATHS

KW - CONFIDENTIAL-INQUIRY

KW - AUDIT

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - OUTCOMES

KW - DATABASE

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - REGISTRY

KW - ACCESS

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.4126

DO - 10.1002/bjs.4126

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 527

EP - 532

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 5

ER -