Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials

the STEER study protocol

Katie Gillies, Peter Bower, Jim Elliott, Graeme MacLennan, Rumana S N Newlands, Margaret Ogden, Shaun P Treweek, Mary Wells, Miles D Witham, Bridget Young, Jill J Francis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.

Methods
This research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders’ perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.

Discussion
We believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants’ experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.
Original languageEnglish
Article number197
JournalTrials
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Focus Groups
Lenses
Clinical Trials
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Trials
  • Retention
  • Non-retention
  • Dropout
  • Theory
  • Intervention
  • Interviews

Cite this

Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials : the STEER study protocol. / Gillies, Katie; Bower, Peter; Elliott, Jim; MacLennan, Graeme; Newlands, Rumana S N; Ogden, Margaret; Treweek, Shaun P; Wells, Mary; Witham, Miles D; Young, Bridget; Francis, Jill J.

In: Trials, Vol. 19, 197, 27.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gillies, Katie ; Bower, Peter ; Elliott, Jim ; MacLennan, Graeme ; Newlands, Rumana S N ; Ogden, Margaret ; Treweek, Shaun P ; Wells, Mary ; Witham, Miles D ; Young, Bridget ; Francis, Jill J. / Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials : the STEER study protocol. In: Trials. 2018 ; Vol. 19.
@article{b43f6a22410243fb827a328aca506cfd,
title = "Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol",
abstract = "BackgroundNon-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.MethodsThis research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders’ perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.DiscussionWe believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants’ experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.",
keywords = "Trials, Retention, Non-retention, Dropout, Theory, Intervention, Interviews",
author = "Katie Gillies and Peter Bower and Jim Elliott and Graeme MacLennan and Newlands, {Rumana S N} and Margaret Ogden and Treweek, {Shaun P} and Mary Wells and Witham, {Miles D} and Bridget Young and Francis, {Jill J}",
note = "Funding: This research is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health and Social Care Department (HIPS/16/46). This manuscript is supported by an Institutional Strategic Skills Award (Women’s returner award held by KG) at the University of Aberdeen which is funded by the Wellcome Trust.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials

T2 - the STEER study protocol

AU - Gillies, Katie

AU - Bower, Peter

AU - Elliott, Jim

AU - MacLennan, Graeme

AU - Newlands, Rumana S N

AU - Ogden, Margaret

AU - Treweek, Shaun P

AU - Wells, Mary

AU - Witham, Miles D

AU - Young, Bridget

AU - Francis, Jill J

N1 - Funding: This research is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health and Social Care Department (HIPS/16/46). This manuscript is supported by an Institutional Strategic Skills Award (Women’s returner award held by KG) at the University of Aberdeen which is funded by the Wellcome Trust.

PY - 2018/3/27

Y1 - 2018/3/27

N2 - BackgroundNon-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.MethodsThis research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders’ perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.DiscussionWe believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants’ experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.

AB - BackgroundNon-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.MethodsThis research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders’ perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.DiscussionWe believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants’ experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.

KW - Trials

KW - Retention

KW - Non-retention

KW - Dropout

KW - Theory

KW - Intervention

KW - Interviews

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0

DO - 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 197

ER -