The acheulean handaxe

More like a bird's song than a beatles' tune?

Raymond Corbey, Adam Jagich, Krist Vaesen, Mark Collard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to provoke debate about the nature of an iconic artifact-the Acheulean handaxe. Specifically, we want to initiate a conversation about whether or not they are cultural objects. The vast majority of archeologists assume that the behaviors involved in the production of handaxes were acquired by social learning and that handaxes are therefore cultural. We will argue that this assumption is not warranted on the basis of the available evidence and that an alternative hypothesis should be given serious consideration. This alternative hypothesis is that the form of Acheulean handaxes was at least partly under genetic control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-19
Number of pages14
JournalEvolutionary anthropology
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date22 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Fingerprint

song
social learning
artifact
conversation
evidence

Keywords

  • Acheulean handaxe
  • cultural transmission
  • social learning
  • genetic transmission

Cite this

The acheulean handaxe : More like a bird's song than a beatles' tune? / Corbey, Raymond; Jagich, Adam; Vaesen, Krist; Collard, Mark.

In: Evolutionary anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 02.2016, p. 6-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbey, Raymond ; Jagich, Adam ; Vaesen, Krist ; Collard, Mark. / The acheulean handaxe : More like a bird's song than a beatles' tune?. In: Evolutionary anthropology. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 6-19.
@article{eb01214ef80543d48074bad35e3969bb,
title = "The acheulean handaxe: More like a bird's song than a beatles' tune?",
abstract = "The goal of this paper is to provoke debate about the nature of an iconic artifact-the Acheulean handaxe. Specifically, we want to initiate a conversation about whether or not they are cultural objects. The vast majority of archeologists assume that the behaviors involved in the production of handaxes were acquired by social learning and that handaxes are therefore cultural. We will argue that this assumption is not warranted on the basis of the available evidence and that an alternative hypothesis should be given serious consideration. This alternative hypothesis is that the form of Acheulean handaxes was at least partly under genetic control.",
keywords = "Acheulean handaxe, cultural transmission, social learning, genetic transmission",
author = "Raymond Corbey and Adam Jagich and Krist Vaesen and Mark Collard",
note = "{\circledC} 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. KV is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. MC is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, and Simon Fraser University",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/evan.21467",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "6--19",
journal = "Evolutionary anthropology",
issn = "1060-1538",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The acheulean handaxe

T2 - More like a bird's song than a beatles' tune?

AU - Corbey, Raymond

AU - Jagich, Adam

AU - Vaesen, Krist

AU - Collard, Mark

N1 - © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. KV is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. MC is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, and Simon Fraser University

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - The goal of this paper is to provoke debate about the nature of an iconic artifact-the Acheulean handaxe. Specifically, we want to initiate a conversation about whether or not they are cultural objects. The vast majority of archeologists assume that the behaviors involved in the production of handaxes were acquired by social learning and that handaxes are therefore cultural. We will argue that this assumption is not warranted on the basis of the available evidence and that an alternative hypothesis should be given serious consideration. This alternative hypothesis is that the form of Acheulean handaxes was at least partly under genetic control.

AB - The goal of this paper is to provoke debate about the nature of an iconic artifact-the Acheulean handaxe. Specifically, we want to initiate a conversation about whether or not they are cultural objects. The vast majority of archeologists assume that the behaviors involved in the production of handaxes were acquired by social learning and that handaxes are therefore cultural. We will argue that this assumption is not warranted on the basis of the available evidence and that an alternative hypothesis should be given serious consideration. This alternative hypothesis is that the form of Acheulean handaxes was at least partly under genetic control.

KW - Acheulean handaxe

KW - cultural transmission

KW - social learning

KW - genetic transmission

U2 - 10.1002/evan.21467

DO - 10.1002/evan.21467

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 6

EP - 19

JO - Evolutionary anthropology

JF - Evolutionary anthropology

SN - 1060-1538

IS - 1

ER -