The arbitrariness of the genetic code

Ulrich Stegmann (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The genetic code has been regarded as arbitrary in the sense that the codon-amino acid assignments could be different than they actually are. This general idea has been spelled out differently by previous, often rather implicit accounts of arbitrariness. They have drawn on the frozen accident theory, on evolutionary contingency, on alternative causal pathways, and on the absence of direct stereochemical interactions between codons and amino acids. It has also been suggested that the arbitrariness of the genetic code justifies attributing semantic information to macromolecules, notably to DNA. I argue that these accounts of arbitrariness are unsatisfactory. I propose that the code is arbitrary in the sense of Jacques Monod's concept of chemical arbitrariness: the genetic code is arbitrary in that any codon requires certain chemical and structural properties to specify a particular amino acid, but these properties are not required in virtue of a principle of chemistry. This notion of arbitrariness is compatible with several recent hypotheses about code evolution. I maintain that the code's chemical arbitrariness is neither sufficient nor necessary for attributing semantic information to nucleic acids.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-222
Number of pages18
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Genetic Code
genetic code
codons
Codon
Semantics
Amino Acids
amino acids
Chemical Phenomena
accidents
Nucleic Acids
nucleic acids
Accidents
chemistry
DNA
Arbitrariness

Keywords

  • Allosteric effectors
  • Arbitrariness
  • Competitive inhibition
  • Complementarity
  • Evolutionary contingency
  • Frozen accident theory
  • Genetic code
  • Genetic information
  • Principles of chemistry

Cite this

The arbitrariness of the genetic code. / Stegmann, Ulrich (Corresponding Author).

In: Biology and Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 2, 31.03.2004, p. 205-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2f949a186bf42578f053cf9f12cb7da,
title = "The arbitrariness of the genetic code",
abstract = "The genetic code has been regarded as arbitrary in the sense that the codon-amino acid assignments could be different than they actually are. This general idea has been spelled out differently by previous, often rather implicit accounts of arbitrariness. They have drawn on the frozen accident theory, on evolutionary contingency, on alternative causal pathways, and on the absence of direct stereochemical interactions between codons and amino acids. It has also been suggested that the arbitrariness of the genetic code justifies attributing semantic information to macromolecules, notably to DNA. I argue that these accounts of arbitrariness are unsatisfactory. I propose that the code is arbitrary in the sense of Jacques Monod's concept of chemical arbitrariness: the genetic code is arbitrary in that any codon requires certain chemical and structural properties to specify a particular amino acid, but these properties are not required in virtue of a principle of chemistry. This notion of arbitrariness is compatible with several recent hypotheses about code evolution. I maintain that the code's chemical arbitrariness is neither sufficient nor necessary for attributing semantic information to nucleic acids.",
keywords = "Allosteric effectors, Arbitrariness, Competitive inhibition, Complementarity, Evolutionary contingency, Frozen accident theory, Genetic code, Genetic information, Principles of chemistry",
author = "Ulrich Stegmann",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1023/B:BIPH.0000024412.82219.a6",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "205--222",
journal = "Biology and Philosophy",
issn = "0169-3867",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The arbitrariness of the genetic code

AU - Stegmann, Ulrich

PY - 2004/3/31

Y1 - 2004/3/31

N2 - The genetic code has been regarded as arbitrary in the sense that the codon-amino acid assignments could be different than they actually are. This general idea has been spelled out differently by previous, often rather implicit accounts of arbitrariness. They have drawn on the frozen accident theory, on evolutionary contingency, on alternative causal pathways, and on the absence of direct stereochemical interactions between codons and amino acids. It has also been suggested that the arbitrariness of the genetic code justifies attributing semantic information to macromolecules, notably to DNA. I argue that these accounts of arbitrariness are unsatisfactory. I propose that the code is arbitrary in the sense of Jacques Monod's concept of chemical arbitrariness: the genetic code is arbitrary in that any codon requires certain chemical and structural properties to specify a particular amino acid, but these properties are not required in virtue of a principle of chemistry. This notion of arbitrariness is compatible with several recent hypotheses about code evolution. I maintain that the code's chemical arbitrariness is neither sufficient nor necessary for attributing semantic information to nucleic acids.

AB - The genetic code has been regarded as arbitrary in the sense that the codon-amino acid assignments could be different than they actually are. This general idea has been spelled out differently by previous, often rather implicit accounts of arbitrariness. They have drawn on the frozen accident theory, on evolutionary contingency, on alternative causal pathways, and on the absence of direct stereochemical interactions between codons and amino acids. It has also been suggested that the arbitrariness of the genetic code justifies attributing semantic information to macromolecules, notably to DNA. I argue that these accounts of arbitrariness are unsatisfactory. I propose that the code is arbitrary in the sense of Jacques Monod's concept of chemical arbitrariness: the genetic code is arbitrary in that any codon requires certain chemical and structural properties to specify a particular amino acid, but these properties are not required in virtue of a principle of chemistry. This notion of arbitrariness is compatible with several recent hypotheses about code evolution. I maintain that the code's chemical arbitrariness is neither sufficient nor necessary for attributing semantic information to nucleic acids.

KW - Allosteric effectors

KW - Arbitrariness

KW - Competitive inhibition

KW - Complementarity

KW - Evolutionary contingency

KW - Frozen accident theory

KW - Genetic code

KW - Genetic information

KW - Principles of chemistry

U2 - 10.1023/B:BIPH.0000024412.82219.a6

DO - 10.1023/B:BIPH.0000024412.82219.a6

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 205

EP - 222

JO - Biology and Philosophy

JF - Biology and Philosophy

SN - 0169-3867

IS - 2

ER -