The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research"

Michela Tinelli, Anthony Scott, Janelle Seymour, Mandy Ryan, Christine Bond, Paul McNamee

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

We (the authors) acknowledge and welcome this letter of clarification from Koeser and McCrone [1] (hereafter referred to as KM). With this reply, we would like to justify and clarify our use and interpretation of quantile regression techniques in quality-of-life research based on our two papers using data from the Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project [2].
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-230
Number of pages2
JournalPharmacoeconomics
Volume32
Issue number2
Early online date18 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Community Medicine
Pharmacies
Quality of Life
Research

Keywords

  • Female
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Cite this

The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research". / Tinelli, Michela; Scott, Anthony; Seymour, Janelle; Ryan, Mandy; Bond, Christine; McNamee, Paul.

In: Pharmacoeconomics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 229-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

@article{09bdb672f3354ef78af2fe838abfe0fc,
title = "The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: {"}on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research{"}",
abstract = "We (the authors) acknowledge and welcome this letter of clarification from Koeser and McCrone [1] (hereafter referred to as KM). With this reply, we would like to justify and clarify our use and interpretation of quantile regression techniques in quality-of-life research based on our two papers using data from the Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project [2].",
keywords = "Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic",
author = "Michela Tinelli and Anthony Scott and Janelle Seymour and Mandy Ryan and Christine Bond and Paul McNamee",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s40273-013-0114-x",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "229--230",
journal = "Pharmacoeconomics",
issn = "1170-7690",
publisher = "Adis International Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research"

AU - Tinelli, Michela

AU - Scott, Anthony

AU - Seymour, Janelle

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - Bond, Christine

AU - McNamee, Paul

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - We (the authors) acknowledge and welcome this letter of clarification from Koeser and McCrone [1] (hereafter referred to as KM). With this reply, we would like to justify and clarify our use and interpretation of quantile regression techniques in quality-of-life research based on our two papers using data from the Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project [2].

AB - We (the authors) acknowledge and welcome this letter of clarification from Koeser and McCrone [1] (hereafter referred to as KM). With this reply, we would like to justify and clarify our use and interpretation of quantile regression techniques in quality-of-life research based on our two papers using data from the Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project [2].

KW - Female

KW - Health Policy

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

U2 - 10.1007/s40273-013-0114-x

DO - 10.1007/s40273-013-0114-x

M3 - Letter

VL - 32

SP - 229

EP - 230

JO - Pharmacoeconomics

JF - Pharmacoeconomics

SN - 1170-7690

IS - 2

ER -