The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research

Blair Hamilton Smith, KI Penny, Alison M Purves, C Munro, B Wilson, J Grimshaw, W Alastair Chambers, William Cairns Stewart Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

292 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11 202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-147
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1997

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • epidemiology
  • measurement instrument
  • validation
  • definition
  • survey
  • general-population
  • prevalence
  • Chronic pain
  • Epidemiology
  • Measurement instrument
  • Validation
  • Definition
  • Survey

Cite this

Smith, B. H., Penny, KI., Purves, A. M., Munro, C., Wilson, B., Grimshaw, J., ... Smith, W. C. S. (1997). The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research . Pain, 71(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire : validation and reliability in postal research . / Smith, Blair Hamilton; Penny, KI; Purves, Alison M; Munro, C; Wilson, B; Grimshaw, J; Chambers, W Alastair; Smith, William Cairns Stewart.

In: Pain, Vol. 71, No. 2, 06.1997, p. 141-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, BH, Penny, KI, Purves, AM, Munro, C, Wilson, B, Grimshaw, J, Chambers, WA & Smith, WCS 1997, 'The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research ', Pain, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2
Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J et al. The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research . Pain. 1997 Jun;71(2):141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2
Smith, Blair Hamilton ; Penny, KI ; Purves, Alison M ; Munro, C ; Wilson, B ; Grimshaw, J ; Chambers, W Alastair ; Smith, William Cairns Stewart. / The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire : validation and reliability in postal research . In: Pain. 1997 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 141-147.
@article{27021997900b493eba234a72f389a0d0,
title = "The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research",
abstract = "The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11 202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76{\%} was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research.",
keywords = "chronic pain, epidemiology, measurement instrument, validation, definition, survey, general-population, prevalence, Chronic pain, Epidemiology, Measurement instrument, Validation, Definition, Survey",
author = "Smith, {Blair Hamilton} and KI Penny and Purves, {Alison M} and C Munro and B Wilson and J Grimshaw and Chambers, {W Alastair} and Smith, {William Cairns Stewart}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "141--147",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire

T2 - validation and reliability in postal research

AU - Smith, Blair Hamilton

AU - Penny, KI

AU - Purves, Alison M

AU - Munro, C

AU - Wilson, B

AU - Grimshaw, J

AU - Chambers, W Alastair

AU - Smith, William Cairns Stewart

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11 202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research.

AB - The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11 202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was >0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research.

KW - chronic pain

KW - epidemiology

KW - measurement instrument

KW - validation

KW - definition

KW - survey

KW - general-population

KW - prevalence

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Measurement instrument

KW - Validation

KW - Definition

KW - Survey

U2 - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

DO - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 141

EP - 147

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 2

ER -