The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries:

Data protection and power asymmetry

Dimitrios Anagnostakis, Christian Kaunert (Corresponding Author), Ethem Ilbiz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-984
Number of pages17
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume29
Issue number6
Early online date4 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Europol
third countries
data protection
Data privacy
asymmetry
data exchange
Electronic data interchange
Morocco
Turkey
pragmatics
flexibility
EU
European Union

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Europol
  • international security
  • International Relations (IR)
  • data protection

Cite this

The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries: Data protection and power asymmetry. / Anagnostakis, Dimitrios; Kaunert, Christian (Corresponding Author); Ilbiz, Ethem.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2017, p. 967-984.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85fd20af505044a9beaf8184ebe0599e,
title = "The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries:: Data protection and power asymmetry",
abstract = "This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.",
keywords = "European Union, Europol, international security, International Relations (IR), data protection",
author = "Dimitrios Anagnostakis and Christian Kaunert and Ethem Ilbiz",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "967--984",
journal = "Terrorism and Political Violence",
issn = "0954-6553",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The counterterrorism agreements of Europol with third countries:

T2 - Data protection and power asymmetry

AU - Anagnostakis, Dimitrios

AU - Kaunert, Christian

AU - Ilbiz, Ethem

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.

AB - This article investigates empirically the impact of power asymmetry and interest formation in the European Union’s (EU) external relations with third countries in the context of the Europol data exchange and counterterrorism agreements. It focuses on three countries, namely the United States, Turkey, and Morocco, which each have a different level of counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. This article argues that the EU acts as a pragmatic actor with regard to Europol’s data exchange agreements with third countries, and that the power asymmetry between the EU and the third country under question determines the extent of the EU’s flexibility. If the power asymmetry favours the EU, then it insists on its data protection demands. Otherwise, the EU is more flexible towards its counterparts on data protection issues.

KW - European Union

KW - Europol

KW - international security

KW - International Relations (IR)

KW - data protection

U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438

DO - 10.1080/09546553.2015.1092438

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 967

EP - 984

JO - Terrorism and Political Violence

JF - Terrorism and Political Violence

SN - 0954-6553

IS - 6

ER -